EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014998
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Bunnings Group Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain statues on 26 March 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1014998 was made on 11 June 2010. It declares that those certain statues are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1014998 is taken to have come into force on 26 March 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014998 was enacted in 2010 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the issue of tariff concessions for specific goods, allowing for reduced customs duties under certain conditions. This instrument was established to provide a mechanism whereby the Chief Executive Officer of Customs could make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) for goods that do not have substitutable alternatives produced domestically, thereby ensuring fair trade practices and potentially stimulating local production of such goods. The enacting body was the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who must be satisfied that the application meets the core criteria specified in the Act. The policy objective, as outlined in the explanatory statement, is to facilitate the importation of goods that do not have local alternatives, thereby benefiting importers and potentially encouraging domestic production over time.
The instrument was created in response to an application from Bunnings Group Ltd for a TCO concerning certain statues, where the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The TCO No. 1014998 declares that these statues are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, reducing the general duty rate of 5% to free. This decision followed a period of public consultation where no objections were raised, ensuring that the rights of all parties were considered, and the TCO came into force on the date of the application, 26 March 2010. Importantly, this TCO does not affect the rights of any person adversely and allows for duty refunds to importers for goods imported since the TCO's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as applied through Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014998, primarily governs the application of reduced customs duty rates on specific imported goods, in this case, statues, under the conditions set out by the Act. This legislation applies to entities or individuals who import goods that qualify for tariff concessions as per the core criteria outlined in the Act. The scope of this Act extends to any entity or person involved in the importation of goods eligible for tariff concessions, ensuring that such imports benefit from the specified lower duty rates provided they meet the statutory requirements. This Act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying Commonwealth-wide and is administered by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who must ensure that the application for tariff concession aligns with the statutory criteria before issuing a Tariff Concession Order (TCO).
The Act specifies that certain goods, as outlined in section 269SJ, are ineligible for tariff concessions. The Act also mandates that if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application is lodged, the core criteria are met. TCO No. 1014998, which was applied for by Bunnings Group Ltd on 26 March 2010, was granted on 11 June 2010, and became effective from the date of application. The Act ensures that the TCO does not adversely affect the rights of any person, except the Commonwealth, and does not impose any liabilities on individuals or entities for actions taken prior to the issuance of the TCO. This legislative framework is instrumental in facilitating smoother import processes for qualifying goods, thereby benefiting the rights of importers and potentially allowing them to claim refunds on duties paid before the TCO's effective date.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this instrument, TCO No. 1014998, pertain to the Customs Act 1901 (section 269F) and the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (item 50 of Schedule 4). Section 269F allows for the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to reduce the customs duty on specified goods, while item 50 of Schedule 4 in the Tariff specifies the duty rate applicable to these goods once a TCO is in effect. This instrument declares that certain statues, as applied for by Bunnings Group Ltd, are subject to a free rate of customs duty rather than the general rate of 5% (section 269P(3)).
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act on the parties it governs include the necessity for the CEO to assess whether an application for a TCO meets the core criteria, which are outlined in section 269C. This involves determining whether no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Furthermore, the Act mandates the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). Additionally, section 269S(1) stipulates that a TCO is considered to have come into force on the day the application was lodged, meaning that TCO No. 1014998 is effective from 26 March 2010.
In terms of the consequences for breach, the Customs Act 1901 does not specify explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for failing to comply with the provisions related to TCOs. However, non-compliance with customs regulations generally can lead to various enforcement actions, including fines and other penalties as prescribed by the relevant legislation. The act of submitting a false or misleading application, for example, could potentially result in legal repercussions under general administrative law principles or other specific statutes. It is important for applicants and entities involved in customs duties to adhere strictly to the requirements set forth to avoid any adverse outcomes.