EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014472
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Wilson Transformer Co Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain transformer core handling machines on 24 March 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1014472 was made on 18 June 2010. It declares that those certain transformer core handling machines are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1014472 is taken to have come into force on 24 March 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014472 was enacted in 2010 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the need for tariff concessions on specific imported goods, in this case, certain transformer core handling machines. This instrument was developed to provide relief from customs duties for goods where no substitutable alternatives are produced domestically. The Customs Act 1901 allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that apply lower rates of customs duty on goods specified in these orders, provided the application meets certain criteria. In this instance, the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia for the specified machines, thus fulfilling the core criteria for a TCO. Consequently, TCO No. 1014472 was issued, reducing the duty on these specific goods from the general rate of 5% to free duty. The instrument was published in the Gazette with an invitation for submissions, though none were received, leading to the issuance of the TCO on 18 June 2010, effective from 24 March 2010. This measure aims to benefit importers by potentially allowing them to apply for refunds of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014472 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods that are the subject of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO), which is made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a lower rate of customs duty. This Act specifically targets businesses or individuals who import goods that are not produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, as defined by sections 269D and 269E of the Act. The application of this legislation is national in scope, as it falls under the Commonwealth's jurisdiction. The TCO does not apply to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which cannot be subject to a TCO. The Instrument No. 1014472, which declares that certain transformer core handling machines are goods to which a lower rate of duty applies, came into effect on 24 March 2010. The CEO did not receive any submissions opposing the TCO after publishing a notice in the Gazette, and the TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration in a way that would disadvantage them or impose liabilities for actions taken prior to the registration.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, establishes the framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which allow for a reduced rate of customs duty on certain goods. Under Section 269F, any person can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in relation to particular goods. The CEO must then assess the application against the criteria outlined in Section 269C, which mandates that a TCO application can only proceed if, on the date of application, there are no substitutable goods being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Substitutable goods, as defined by Section 269D and Section 269E, are those produced in Australia that could serve the same use as the goods in question.
Once the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they are required by Subsection 269P(3) to issue a written order, effectively a TCO, specifying that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This results in a tariff concession, often leading to a duty-free status for the specified goods. In the case of TCO No. 1014472, which pertains to certain transformer core handling machines, the general duty rate of 5% is reduced to zero, as the CEO was convinced that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia.
The Act imposes certain obligations on the CEO, primarily to ensure transparency and fairness in the TCO process. For instance, Subsection 269K(1) mandates that the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to submit objections or reasons why the TCO should not proceed. This ensures that the process is open and allows for any relevant concerns to be addressed. In the instance of TCO No. 1014472, no submissions were received in response to the published notice. Furthermore, the Act under Subsection 269S(1) specifies that a TCO is effective from the date the application is lodged, which for TCO No. 1014472 is 24 March 2010.
The legislation also outlines the implications and protections for those affected by a TCO. It explicitly states that a TCO does not retroactively disadvantage any person or impose liabilities for actions taken before the TCO's effective date. For importers, this means they can apply for a refund of duties paid on goods imported since the TCO's effective date, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. The TCO itself does not impose any liabilities on any person, ensuring that the transition to the new tariff rate is smooth and does not unfairly burden any party.