EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014057
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Macquarie Textiles Group Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain yarn on 22 March 2010.
Instrument
TCO No 1014057 was made on 11 June 2010. It declares that those certain yarn are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 1014057 is taken to have come into force on 22 March 2010.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014057 was enacted in 2010 under the Customs Act 1901 to provide relief for importers of certain types of yarn by reducing or eliminating the customs duty on these goods. This instrument was introduced to address the gap in tariff concessions for goods where no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thereby allowing for a more competitive market. The instrument was created by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) following a valid application by Macquarie Textiles Group Ltd on 22 March 2010. The CEO determined that the application met the core criteria as outlined in the Customs Act, particularly under sections 269C and 269SJ, which assess the production status of substitutable goods in Australia. The Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 1014057 was published in the Gazette, inviting submissions which none were received. The TCO came into effect on the date of the application, 22 March 2010, and it does not affect any pre-existing rights or impose liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth. This legislative instrument aims to facilitate smoother importation and trade by reducing the financial burden on importers.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 1014057 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods, namely certain yarn, for which Macquarie Textiles Group Ltd applied for a tariff concession order (TCO). The TCO applies to entities involved in the importation of these specific yarns, providing them with a lower rate of customs duty as outlined in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This instrument falls under the Commonwealth's jurisdiction, meaning it applies nationally across Australia. The instrument specifies that a TCO is applicable when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, thereby granting tariff concessions. Notably, the TCO does not disadvantage any person, except the Commonwealth, by affecting their rights as at the date of registration or imposing liabilities for actions taken prior to the registration date. Additionally, the TCO does not impose any new liabilities on any person. The scope of this legislation extends to allow for the CEO to make written orders based on applications that meet the core criteria, with the TCO in this instance coming into effect on the date the application was lodged, 22 March 2010.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, outlines the process for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for a reduced rate of customs duty on certain goods. Section 269F of the Act allows an individual to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO. If the application pertains to goods not listed in section 269SJ, which excludes certain goods from TCO eligibility, the CEO assesses whether the application meets the core criteria under section 269C. A TCO application meets these criteria if, on the date of application, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, as defined by sections 269D and 269E. Section 269B further explains that 'substitutable goods' are those produced in Australia and used in a way that corresponds with the intended use of the goods in question. If the CEO determines that the application meets these criteria, they must issue a written order, as stipulated in subsection 269P(3), which specifies that the goods in question will be subject to a prescribed tariff item listed in Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
The obligations imposed by the Act require that the CEO publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to submit reasons why a TCO should not be granted, as per subsection 269K(1). This ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for stakeholders to voice any concerns. In the case of Macquarie Textiles Group Ltd's application for a TCO regarding certain yarn, the CEO issued TCO No. 1014057 on 11 June 2010, declaring that these specific yarns would be subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, resulting in a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%. Importantly, the TCO's effective date is the same as the application date, 22 March 2010, under subsection 269S(1). This means that importers can apply for duty refunds on goods imported since this date under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
The Act also stipulates that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth, ensuring that no one is disadvantaged or incurs liabilities for actions taken before the TCO's registration date. Given that the TCO provides a benefit to importers by allowing them to claim refunds on duties paid on imported goods since the TCO's effective date, the Act ensures that such rights are protected. Furthermore, the Act explicitly states that the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, providing clarity on the implications of the concession.