EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0948883
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Rio Tinto Aluminium applied for a TCO in respect of certain filter bag cages on 15 December 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0948883 was made on 12 March 2010. It declares that those certain filter bag cages are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0948883 is taken to have come into force on 15 December 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders provide reduced rates of customs duty on specific goods, aiming to promote economic efficiency and support particular industries. The introduction of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0948883, effective from 12 March 2010, addresses the need for duty reductions on certain filter bag cages, as determined by the CEO following an application from Rio Tinto Aluminium on 15 December 2009. This instrument was introduced to ensure that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application, thereby meeting the core criteria outlined in section 269C of the Act. The policy objective is to facilitate trade by reducing the cost burden on specific imports, thus enhancing competitiveness without imposing additional liabilities on non-Commonwealth entities.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0948883, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies specifically to the goods for which Rio Tinto Aluminium applied, namely certain filter bag cages. This Act governs the process by which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can grant a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) that reduces the rate of customs duty on specified goods. The application of this instrument is limited to goods for which no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, as per the criteria set out in section 269C of the Act. The TCO provides relief by setting the duty rate at zero, whereas the general rate for such goods is 5%. The legislation ensures that the concession does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on anyone in respect of actions taken before the registration of the TCO, while it may favourably affect the rights of importers who can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into effect. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it applies across Australia, and it does not extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Customs Act 1901 that are relevant here include section 269C (2) (which stipulates the core criteria for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) application), section 269F (which allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs for a TCO), and section 269P (which provides for the CEO to make a TCO if certain criteria are met). Section 269SJ sets out the goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The Act also requires that the CEO publish a notice in the Gazette when accepting a TCO application as valid, inviting any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission (subsection 269K(1)).
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties and entities it governs are primarily on the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The CEO must decide whether a TCO application meets the core criteria, which involves determining whether no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the criteria, they must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties when accepting a TCO application as valid.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach. However, it is important to note that the TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. This implies that any breach of the Act's provisions would likely result in a legal challenge rather than a criminal or civil penalty.
The tariff concession granted under TCO No. 0948883 is a significant benefit to the entity that applied for it, Rio Tinto Aluminium. It allows for certain filter bag cages to be imported duty-free, whereas the general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. This concession does not affect the rights of any other person as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person. The TCO came into force on the date the application was lodged, 15 December 2009.
Under the Customs (Tariff) Regulations 1997, importers of such goods can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. This provides a financial incentive for importers to take advantage of the tariff concession, thereby potentially increasing the volume of the specified goods being imported into Australia.