Tariff Concession Order 0946732

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2010L01354 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0946732

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

The Decor Corporation applied for a TCO in respect of certain polypropylene lids on 2 December 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0946732 was made on 26 February 2010.  It declares that those certain polypropylene lids are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0946732 is taken to have come into force on 2 December 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0946732, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the need for tariff concessions for specific imported goods that do not have substitutable domestic production. This instrument was introduced to facilitate trade by reducing customs duty rates on certain goods, thereby encouraging imports and supporting economic activity. The Customs Act 1901 allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) based on applications, provided the goods do not have substitutable Australian-made equivalents and meet other specified criteria. The policy objective of this legislative instrument is to ensure that tariff concessions are granted fairly and in accordance with the established criteria, benefiting importers by reducing their duty costs while ensuring that domestic industries are not unfairly disadvantaged.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, through its Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) scheme, applies to any person or entity seeking to import goods into Australia and have a lower rate of customs duty applied to those goods. Specifically, section 269F of the Act allows for applications to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO, provided the goods do not fall under the exclusions specified in section 269SJ. For the application to be considered, it must meet core criteria outlined in sections 269C and 269D, which include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as the CEO's decision impacts all importers within Australia. Additionally, the Act extends its application through subordinate instruments such as the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which specifies the duty rates applicable to goods under various schedules, including those affected by TCOs. Any TCO made under the Act does not affect existing rights or impose liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth, as per subsection 269S(1).

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) provides a framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA. Specifically, section 269F allows for an application to be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application does not relate to goods specified in section 269SJ, which cannot be subject to a TCO, and that it meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C, the CEO must make a written order declaring the goods subject to the TCO. This is a crucial provision as it lays down the conditions under which the CEO can grant a TCO, thereby reducing the rate of customs duty on specified goods. The obligations imposed by the Act on parties include the requirement for the CEO to assess whether an application meets the core criteria for a TCO. This involves confirming that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged, as outlined in sections 269C, 269D, 269E and 269P(3). Furthermore, under subsection 269K(1), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made. These obligations ensure that the process for granting TCOs is transparent and allows for input from stakeholders. Breaches of the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 can result in various consequences. Under section 269K, failure to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions, or not considering valid submissions, can be considered an administrative oversight and may be subject to review or correction by the courts. Additionally, any misuse or fraudulent application for a TCO could result in criminal charges under the Act. Penalties for such breaches can include fines and imprisonment, although specific maximum penalties are not detailed in the provided text. It is essential for parties to adhere to the statutory requirements to avoid these adverse consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.