EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0944791
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
McPherson's Consumer Products Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain tubular knitted bags on 25 November 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0944791 was made on 05 February 2010. It declares that those certain tubular knitted bags are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 7.5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0944791 is taken to have come into force on 25 November 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was amended to introduce the ability to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through Part XVA, which allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to apply lower rates of customs duty to specified goods. This legislative measure was enacted to address the gap in the Customs Act by allowing for tariff concessions on goods not produced domestically and for which no suitable substitute is available. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0944791, enacted in 2010, is an example of this legislative provision in action, where McPherson's Consumer Products Pty Ltd successfully applied for a TCO on certain tubular knitted bags, resulting in a duty rate of free instead of the general rate of 7.5%. The policy objective of this legislation is to encourage imports of goods not produced in Australia and to provide relief to importers by potentially allowing refunds of duty paid prior to the TCO's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0944791, issued under the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific goods—in this instance, certain tubular knitted bags—and provides for a reduced rate of customs duty, from 7.5% to free, upon application and approval by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This instrument is designed to benefit entities and individuals involved in the importation of these goods by reducing their financial burden. The Act applies across the Commonwealth of Australia, with its jurisdiction stemming from the Customs Act 1901. The process for applying for such a tariff concession is outlined in section 269F of the Act, where an application must be made to the CEO, and the application must meet certain criteria as set out in sections 269C and 269D of the Act. Notably, the instrument does not apply to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which are ineligible for tariff concessions. The instrument became effective from 25 November 2009, the date on which the application was lodged, as per subsection 269S(1) of the Act. The instrument does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, provides for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that can reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods. Section 269F of the Act outlines the process whereby a person can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO. To be considered, the application must not relate to goods specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that are ineligible for a TCO. If the CEO determines that the application meets the core criteria specified in section 269C, a TCO is to be issued.
Section 269C stipulates that an application meets the core criteria if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application was lodged. The Act defines "goods produced in Australia" in section 269D, "ordinary course of business" in section 269E, and "substitutable goods" in section 269D in relation to goods the subject of a TCO application. Essentially, this means that if no Australian-made goods are capable of performing the same function as the imported goods in question, the application is eligible for a concession.
Upon satisfaction that the application meets the core criteria, the CEO must issue a written order under section 269P(3), declaring that the goods are subject to a specified item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For example, TCO No. 0944791, made on 5 February 2010, declared that certain tubular knitted bags were subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, resulting in a duty rate of free instead of the general rate of 7.5%. The CEO is also required to publish a notice in the Gazette under section 269K(1) inviting submissions from interested parties; however, in this case, no submissions were received.
The Act imposes obligations on the CEO to process TCO applications and to ensure they meet the core criteria before issuance. It also mandates that TCOs do not adversely affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth regarding actions taken before the TCO’s registration. Importers benefit from this arrangement as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO was taken to have come into force on the application date. Importantly, the TCO does not impose any new liabilities on any person.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901 or the associated regulations could lead to penalties. Under section 287 of the Act, any person who contravenes the Act or the regulations may be liable for a civil penalty of up to $22,200 for a corporation and $4,440 for an individual. Criminal penalties, as outlined in section 291, can include fines of up to $222,000 for a corporation and $44,400 for an individual, or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, depending on the severity of the offence. These provisions underscore the importance of adhering to the legislative framework governing TCOs.