EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0944270
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
McPhersons Consumer Products applied for a TCO in respect of certain windscreen cleaners on 23 November 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0944270 was made on 29 January 2010. It declares that those certain windscreen cleaners are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0944270 is taken to have come into force on 23 November 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0944270 was enacted under the Customs Act 1901 to address the specific issue of tariff concessions for certain imported goods. This legislation was introduced to provide relief from customs duty for goods that meet certain criteria, particularly when no equivalent goods are produced in Australia. The instrument was created to facilitate this process by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) if the application for tariff concession meets the core criteria as outlined in the Act. The primary objective of this legislation is to ensure that the application process for tariff concessions is efficient and that the rights of importers are protected, allowing them to apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the TCO came into effect.
The instrument was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and is intended to provide a streamlined mechanism for granting tariff concessions, ensuring that the process is fair and transparent. The Explanatory Statement highlights that the TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person. This approach ensures that the rights of importers are beneficially affected, and they can effectively seek refunds for duties paid on imported goods since the TCO was deemed to have come into force.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0944270, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to the specific goods—certain windscreen cleaners—for which McPhersons Consumer Products lodged an application on 23 November 2009. The instrument was issued on 29 January 2010 by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application. The Act facilitates tariff concessions for goods not produced domestically, enabling a lower rate of customs duty, in this case, reducing the duty from 5% to free. This instrument is jurisdictional in scope, applying under the Commonwealth, and its effect is to benefit importers by potentially allowing them to claim a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO was taken to have come into force, without imposing any new liabilities on any person. The instrument does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration in a manner that would disadvantage them or impose liabilities in respect of actions taken before the registration date.
Key Provisions
Section 269F of the Customs Act 1901 provides the framework for the application process whereby an individual or entity can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). The core criteria for a TCO application to be considered are outlined in sections 269C and 269D of the Act. Section 269C specifies that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the date of lodgement, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The definitions for "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that these criteria are met, they are required to issue a TCO under section 269P(3), declaring the goods to which a specified item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved primarily revolve around the submission and evaluation of TCO applications. Section 269K(1) mandates that the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to lodge submissions if they believe the TCO should not be made. In this case, no submissions were received, indicating a lack of opposition to the TCO. The Act also imposes a duty on the CEO to ensure that the application does not concern goods specified in section 269SJ, which lists those ineligible for a TCO. The Act further stipulates that the TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose liabilities on any person for actions taken prior to the TCO's effective date.
Under the Customs Act 1901, breaches of the conditions set out for TCOs could potentially lead to various civil or criminal consequences. Although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, the Act generally allows for enforcement actions against parties who fail to comply with its provisions. Penalties can range from fines to more severe sanctions depending on the nature and severity of the breach. For example, non-compliance with customs regulations could result in financial penalties, confiscation of goods, or even criminal charges in egregious cases. However, the precise penalties for breaching the TCO provisions are not explicitly outlined in this document.