Tariff Concession Order 0939874

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2010L01118 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0939874

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Simplot Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain beetroot processing line on 23 October 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0939874  was made on 04 January 2010.  It declares that those certain beetroot processing line are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0939874 is taken to have come into force on 23 October 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, as amended, provides a framework for the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can apply a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0939874 was enacted to address a specific application by Simplot Australia for a tariff concession on certain beetroot processing lines. This instrument was made on 4 January 2010 and declared that the specified beetroot processing lines are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies, resulting in a duty rate of free instead of the general rate of 5%. The instrument was introduced to facilitate the importation of these goods without the imposition of customs duty, thereby benefiting importers who can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into effect on 23 October 2010. The process involved public consultation, though no submissions were received in response to the notice published in the Gazette.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0939874 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods for which a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) has been made, allowing for a lower rate of customs duty. This applies to entities or individuals importing these specified goods, particularly Simplot Australia's import of certain beetroot processing lines, which have been granted a tariff concession effective from 23 October 2009. The scope of the Act extends to the Commonwealth, covering all territories and states within Australia. The TCO exempts the named goods from the standard duty rate, instead applying a zero-duty rate. The legislation does not affect any pre-existing rights or liabilities of individuals or entities, except for the Commonwealth, and provides a benefit to importers by potentially allowing them to apply for a refund of duties paid on these goods since the date the TCO came into force. Any broader application or modification of the TCO's effects is managed through subordinate instruments, which may further define the application and reach of the concession.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0939874 under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) pertains to the application of tariff concession orders (TCOs) for certain goods. According to section 269F, any person can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) for a TCO if the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The core criteria for a TCO application, as stated in section 269C, are that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. The CEO must then decide whether the application meets these criteria. If satisfied, the CEO is required to issue a written order (a TCO) under section 269P(3), specifying that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For the beetroot processing line in question, this TCO declares that these goods are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, resulting in a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Firstly, the CEO must, as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, publish a notice in the Gazette (subsection 269K(1)). This notice includes an invitation for any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to submit their views to the CEO. In this case, no submissions were received in response to the invitation. Furthermore, the TCO is deemed to have come into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged (subsection 269S(1)), which, for TCO No. 0939874, is 23 October 2009. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration in a way that disadvantages that person or imposes liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. Regarding potential consequences for breaches, the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for failing to comply with the TCO provisions. However, any breach of customs laws, including those pertaining to tariff concessions, can result in significant legal and financial repercussions. These may include fines, imprisonment, or other penalties as prescribed under the broader customs legislation. Importers can benefit from applying for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. However, the Act ensures that the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, thereby protecting them from potential disadvantages or liabilities arising from actions taken before the TCO was registered.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.