Tariff Concession Order 0934613

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2010L00907 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0934613

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Bolle Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain protective eyewear parts on 15 September 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0934613 was made on 04 December 2009.  It declares that those certain protective eyewear parts are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0934613 is taken to have come into force on 15 September 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to provide a comprehensive framework for the administration of customs and excise duties. The Act establishes a tariff concession scheme, enabling the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods through the issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). This mechanism addresses the gap by providing relief to businesses that rely on imported goods that do not have domestic substitutes, thereby fostering a competitive environment and supporting industry growth. The policy objective behind this initiative is to promote economic efficiency by lowering the cost of imported goods that are essential for production but do not have locally produced alternatives. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0934613 clarifies that Bolle Australia’s application for tariff concessions on specific protective eyewear parts was approved as no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, resulting in a duty rate of free instead of the general 5%.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0934613, made under Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific goods in relation to which Bolle Australia made an application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) on 15 September 2009. The application pertains to certain protective eyewear parts, which were declared by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) as being subject to a TCO after satisfying the core criteria under section 269C of the Act. This declaration led to the issuance of Tariff Concession Order No. 0934613 on 4 December 2009, effectively reducing the duty on these goods from 5% to free, thereby benefiting importers who can apply for duty refunds on imports made since the date the TCO is considered to have come into force. The TCO applies nationally within the Commonwealth of Australia and does not impose any liabilities on any person, nor does it affect any pre-existing rights of persons other than the Commonwealth. The TCO does not specify exclusions or exemptions beyond the general criteria outlined in the Customs Act 1901, and it does not extend or restrict its application through any subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, establishes a framework for the issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) (sections 269F and 269P(3)). A TCO results in a lower rate of customs duty being applied to specified goods. For instance, Bolle Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain protective eyewear parts, which was granted under TCO No. 0934613, effective from 15 September 2009. This order declared that these specific parts were subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby exempting them from the general 5% duty rate, making them duty-free. Under the Act, any person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods, provided those goods are not specified in section 269SJ as ineligible for a TCO (section 269F). The CEO must assess whether the application meets the core criteria, which include ensuring that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged (section 269C). The definitions of "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are detailed in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively. For example, in the case of Bolle Australia's application, the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia, thereby satisfying the core criteria. The CEO is also required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to lodge submissions if they believe the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). In this instance, no submissions were received, which facilitated the issuance of TCO No. 0934613. The TCO is considered to have come into force on the date the application was lodged, as per subsection 269S(1). Importantly, this order does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person (subsection 269S(2)). Importers of the specified goods will benefit from this TCO by being able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 or the regulations may result in civil or criminal penalties. The exact nature and severity of these penalties are detailed in the relevant sections of the Act and associated regulations. For instance, any breach of the provisions could potentially lead to fines or imprisonment, depending on the specific offence and the discretion of the court. It is essential for entities and individuals governed by the Act to adhere strictly to its requirements to avoid such consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.