Tariff Concession Order 0927435

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2010L00499 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0927435

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Eraring Energy applied for a TCO in respect of certain dry bottom ash handling system on 30 July 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0927435 was made on 23 October 2009.  It declares that those certain dry bottom ash handling system are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0927435 is taken to have come into force on 30 July 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and serves to regulate the customs duties applicable to imported goods. It provides a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to allow for lower rates of customs duty on specific goods. This legislative measure was introduced to address the need for more flexible and targeted tariff arrangements that can promote trade and economic efficiency by reducing the duty burden on particular goods, provided they meet specific criteria such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The policy objective is to facilitate smoother trade operations by offering tariff relief where appropriate, thus supporting industries that rely on importing specific materials or components. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0927435, made on 23 October 2009, is an example of how the Act is applied in practice. In this instance, Eraring Energy applied for a TCO concerning certain dry bottom ash handling systems, which was subsequently granted as the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application. This decision resulted in the goods in question being subject to a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%. The instrument came into force on the date the application was lodged, 30 July 2009, and does not affect the rights of any person adversely, while potentially benefiting importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duties paid on imports since the effective date of the TCO.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0927435 applies to certain dry bottom ash handling systems, with the legislation stemming from the Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA which outlines the process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders are administered by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who has the authority to reduce or eliminate customs duty on goods that are the subject of a TCO. The instrument applies to entities or individuals importing the specified goods into Australia, as it pertains to the reduction of customs duty from a general rate of 5% to free for the goods in question. This concession is applicable nationally, as the Customs Act 1901 operates within the Commonwealth jurisdiction. The scope of the Act includes all entities engaged in the importation of the specified goods, with no exclusions mentioned for this particular TCO. Any changes or extensions to the application of the TCO would typically be managed through subordinate instruments or regulations, as per the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and related regulations.

Key Provisions

Section 269F of the Customs Act 1901 allows for the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by any person seeking to import goods under a lower rate of customs duty. This section facilitates the process whereby a person may apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs to establish a TCO for specific goods. For a TCO to be considered, it must be ensured that the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which outlines goods that are ineligible for a TCO. Once an application is deemed valid, the CEO must evaluate whether it meets the core criteria, primarily focusing on the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia as outlined in sections 269C and 269P of the Act. The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties involved in the TCO process. For instance, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application, inviting any interested parties to submit reasons why the TCO should not proceed. This ensures transparency and allows for any relevant objections to be considered before a decision is made. Eraring Energy, as the applicant in this case, must ensure their application aligns with the stipulated criteria, particularly focusing on the production of substitutable goods in Australia. Additionally, the CEO's role includes making a written order declaring the goods subject to the TCO, which is essential for the tariff concession to be legally enforceable. In terms of consequences, the Customs Act 1901 does not specify particular offences or penalties for non-compliance with the TCO process itself. However, any breaches of related customs regulations or misuse of the tariff concession could lead to civil or criminal penalties under other sections of the Act. For example, providing false information in an application or evading customs duties could result in fines or imprisonment. In this specific case, the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, and it does not affect the rights of a person as at the date of registration, ensuring that no existing rights or obligations are adversely impacted by the concession.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Licensing & Registration
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.