EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0922439
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
McPherson's Consumer Products applied for a TCO in respect of certain kitchen tools set on 30 June 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0922439 was made on 18 September 2009. It declares that those certain kitchen tools set are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0922439 is taken to have come into force on 30 June 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to facilitate trade by reducing customs duty on specified goods. The Customs Act establishes a mechanism whereby the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can issue TCOs to lower the customs duty on goods that meet certain criteria, specifically when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The objective of this legislative scheme is to support Australian trade by making imported goods more competitively priced, thus encouraging their use and fostering economic growth. This is evident in the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0922439, which was introduced to provide tariff concessions on certain kitchen tools set, effective from 30 June 2009, thereby setting the duty rate at free instead of the general 5% rate. The process involved no public submissions opposing the concession, and it does not impose any liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth, while potentially benefiting importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duties paid prior to the concession's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, establishes a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which reduce the customs duty payable on certain goods. This Act applies to any person or entity seeking a tariff concession for goods that are not specified in section 269SJ as ineligible, and it encompasses a broad range of industries and transactions involving imported goods. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as it operates within the framework of the Australian Customs Act and is subject to the provisions of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. Importantly, the Act does not apply to goods specified in section 269SJ, which outlines those ineligible for tariff concessions. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, such as the Customs Tariff Regulations, which may further define terms or provide specific details on the application process and criteria. The commencement of a TCO is deemed to be the day on which the application is lodged, ensuring that the rights of importers are protected and they can apply for duty refunds for goods imported since the effective date of the concession.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0922439 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269P(3)) declare that certain kitchen tools set are subject to a tariff concession order (TCO). This means that the goods specified in the TCO are eligible for a reduced or free rate of customs duty, in this case, a reduction from the general rate of 5% to free. The instrument was issued following an application by McPherson's Consumer Products on 30 June 2009 and came into force on the same date, as required by section 269S(1) of the Act. This TCO applies to goods specified in item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must first ensure that the application for a TCO does not pertain to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which are ineligible for a TCO. If the application is valid, the CEO must then assess whether it meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. Substitutable goods are defined in section 269D as goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use to which the goods the subject of the application can be put. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must make a written order declaring that the goods are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Tariff.
Furthermore, under section 269K(1) of the Act, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid. This notice invites any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. In the case of TCO No. 0922439, no submissions were received in response to this invitation. The TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.
Breach of the provisions under this Act can lead to various civil and criminal consequences. The Act does not explicitly state the maximum penalties for breach; however, non-compliance with customs regulations can generally result in penalties under the Customs Act 1901, which may include fines and imprisonment. For example, knowingly or recklessly making a false statement or representation in connection with a customs matter can lead to a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, under section 236 of the Act. Similarly, attempting to evade customs duty by providing false information can attract severe penalties, including substantial fines and imprisonment. It is essential for all parties to comply with the requirements set out in the Act to avoid these severe consequences.