Tariff Concession Order 0922175

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2010L00342 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0922175

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Bluescope Steel Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain hot dip zinc coated steel on 29 June 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0922175 was made on 18 September 2009.  It declares that those certain hot dip zinc coated steel are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0922175 is taken to have come into force on 29 June 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise in Australia. It was introduced to address the need for streamlined and effective customs procedures that support trade while also protecting revenue and regulatory interests. Part XVA of the Act introduces the concept of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for the reduction or elimination of customs duties on certain goods under specific conditions. This legislative instrument responds to the problem of ensuring fair trade practices and the economic efficiency of Australian industries by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concessions where appropriate. The policy objective is to facilitate the import of goods that cannot be produced in Australia, thereby supporting industries and consumers by reducing costs and increasing the availability of certain products.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, outlines a scheme that enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that reduce the customs duty on certain goods. This applies to any person or entity applying for such a concession, provided the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act as ineligible for a TCO. The application process requires the CEO to determine whether the goods meet the core criteria, primarily that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application is lodged. Should the CEO be satisfied that the application meets these criteria, a TCO is issued, effectively applying a prescribed lower rate of duty on the specified goods. The TCO mechanism is operational across the Commonwealth of Australia and affects the rights of importers who can benefit from reduced duty rates, potentially applying for refunds on duties paid prior to the TCO's effective date. Importantly, the TCO does not disadvantage or impose liabilities on any person for actions taken before the TCO's effective date, which in this case is 29 June 2009.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0922175 under the Customs Act 1901 include sections 269C, 269F, 269P, and 269S. Section 269F allows an individual to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) concerning certain goods. Section 269C outlines the core criteria that the application must meet, specifically that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. If the CEO is satisfied that these criteria are met, they are required under section 269P(3) to make a written order (TCO), specifying the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 that applies to the goods. This instrument, TCO No. 0922175, was made on 18 September 2009, declaring certain hot dip zinc coated steel as goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 applies, with the duty rate for these goods being free. The Customs Act 1901 imposes several obligations on the parties involved in the TCO process. The CEO must, under section 269K(1), publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, inviting any interested parties to submit reasons why the TCO should not be made. Although Bluescope Steel Pty Ltd's application for a TCO in respect of certain hot dip zinc coated steel on 29 June 2009 resulted in the CEO making TCO No. 0922175, no submissions were received in response to the published notice. Furthermore, the Act ensures that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration in a way that would disadvantage them or impose liabilities concerning anything done or omitted before the registration date. Any breaches of the obligations under the Customs Act 1901 may result in civil or criminal penalties. The specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach are not detailed in the explanatory statement provided for TCO No. 0922175. However, the Act generally provides for penalties that can include fines and imprisonment for serious breaches. For example, under section 236 of the Customs Act 1901, a person who commits an offence against the Act can be subject to a penalty of up to five times the value of the goods in respect of which the offence is committed. Additionally, under section 237, if a person is found guilty of an offence against the Act, they can be fined or imprisoned for up to two years or both. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.