EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920930
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Viridian Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain glass transport trolleys on 19 June 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0920930 was made on 04 September 2009. It declares that those certain glass transport trolleys are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0920930 is taken to have come into force on 19 June 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to facilitate the administration of customs duties and related regulations, and to provide a framework for tariff concessions that can be applied to certain goods. A significant aspect of this Act is the ability for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods if certain criteria are met. The problem or gap that this legislative scheme aims to address is the potential for unfair economic disadvantages to Australian businesses and consumers when certain imported goods do not have local substitutes, thereby making local production uncompetitive. The policy objective behind TCOs is to support Australian industries by ensuring that customs duties are not levied on goods where local production is not feasible or economically viable, thereby fostering a more balanced and competitive market. The explanatory statement outlines the process by which Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920930 was enacted, detailing the application by Viridian Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain glass transport trolleys, the subsequent assessment by the CEO of Customs, and the eventual publication and implementation of the TCO.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920930 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to any entity seeking tariff concessions for specific goods, in this case, glass transport trolleys, provided that these goods are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act which outlines goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. This Act operates under Commonwealth jurisdiction and extends its application through subordinate instruments such as the Regulations. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business at the time of the application. The application by Viridian Pty Ltd was lodged on 19 June 2009, and the TCO was declared on 4 September 2009, effective from the date of the application. Notably, this TCO does not affect any existing rights of persons other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on any person. Importers of the specified goods will benefit from the tariff concession and may apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920930 under the Customs Act 1901 sets forth a concession for certain glass transport trolleys, granting them a reduced customs duty rate (section 269C). This concession is contingent upon the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) determining that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time the application is made (section 269SJ). Specifically, the CEO must ascertain that no goods produced in Australia, defined by section 269D, are available in the ordinary course of business and can be substituted for the goods in question (section 269E). If these criteria are met, the CEO is required to issue a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) that declares the goods to which a particular item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies, as outlined in section 269P(3). In this case, the glass transport trolleys are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, resulting in a duty-free status, whereas the general rate for such goods is 5% (section 269F).
The Customs Act 1901 imposes several obligations on the parties involved in the application and implementation of a TCO. For instance, an applicant such as Viridian Pty Ltd must submit an application to the CEO, ensuring that it complies with the criteria specified in section 269C. The CEO is obligated to evaluate the application to determine if it meets the core criteria and, if so, to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from interested parties (subsection 269K(1)). If no submissions are received, the CEO is mandated to issue the TCO (subsection 269S(1)). Additionally, the Act requires that the TCO should not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration, thus safeguarding existing rights and imposing no new liabilities (subsection 269S(1)).
Failure to comply with the requirements set forth in the Customs Act 1901 can lead to various consequences. While specific offences, penalties, or consequences are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of the Act can generally result in civil or criminal penalties. For instance, non-compliance with the duty obligations or misrepresentation in applications may lead to fines or other civil penalties. Additionally, criminal charges could be pursued in cases of deliberate or egregious breaches, potentially resulting in substantial fines or imprisonment, although the exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the offence as interpreted by the courts.
In summary, the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920930 provides for the duty-free importation of certain glass transport trolleys, contingent on the CEO's determination that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The Act outlines specific obligations for applicants and the CEO, including the publication of notices and the evaluation of applications. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific penalties for non-compliance, the general framework of the Act suggests that breaches could result in civil or criminal consequences, underscoring the importance of adhering to the stipulated requirements.