EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920745
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Bradken Resources applied for a TCO in respect of certain auto closer moulds on 18 June 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0920745 was made on 14 September 2009. It declares that those certain auto closer moulds are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0920745 is taken to have come into force on 18 June 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that offer reduced customs duty rates on specified goods. This legislative framework addresses the need for economic incentives to encourage the importation of goods that are not produced domestically, thereby supporting competitive markets and consumer access to a broader range of products. The Act enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant these concessions, provided that the application meets the core criteria, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. Instrument TCO No. 0920745, issued on 14 September 2009, exemplifies the application of these provisions to certain auto closer moulds, resulting in a reduction of the duty rate from 5% to free. This instrument came into force on the date the application was lodged, 18 June 2009, and does not impose any new liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth, while allowing eligible importers to seek duty refunds for imports made since the effective date of the concession.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, facilitates the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which provide for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. This process is initiated when a person applies to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO, provided the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act and meet the core criteria outlined in section 269C. The core criteria require that on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The CEO must then determine if the application meets these criteria, and if so, issue a TCO that specifies the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applicable to the goods in question. The TCO applies nationally and is effective from the date the application was lodged, as per subsection 269S(1) of the Act. The instrument does not retroactively affect the rights of any person, including importers who may benefit from the concession by applying for a refund of duty under the Regulations. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made, though in the case of TCO No. 0920745, no such submissions were received.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 0920745, which is covered under Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific auto closer moulds and provides a tariff concession, effectively setting the customs duty rate at free. This concession applies from the date the application was lodged, which in this case was 18 June 2009 (section 269S(1)). The TCO was issued on 14 September 2009, following a determination by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) that the application met the core criteria specified in section 269C of the Act. This determination was made on the basis that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time the application was lodged (subsection 269P(3)).
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties involved are primarily centred around the application and assessment processes for tariff concessions. The CEO must, as soon as practicable after accepting an application as valid, publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties who might have reasons to oppose the concession (subsection 269K(1)). In this instance, no submissions were received. Additionally, the CEO must ensure that the application meets the core criteria, which includes verifying that no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (section 269C). The Act also requires that the TCO does not adversely affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration, nor impose any liabilities in respect of actions taken prior to the registration date (subsection 269S(2)).
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches related to TCOs. However, any breach of the Customs Act 1901 or its regulations could potentially lead to civil or criminal penalties as provided under other sections of the Act. For instance, under section 217 of the Act, any person who knowingly or recklessly makes a false statement in connection with any matter under the Act may be liable for a penalty. The maximum penalty for an individual can be up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for five years, or both, as per section 217(1)(a). For a body corporate, the maximum penalty can be up to 50,000 penalty units under section 217(1)(b). Additionally, failure to comply with the Act or its regulations could also result in confiscation of goods, fines, and other administrative consequences as deemed appropriate by the court.