Tariff Concession Order 0920259

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2010L01163 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920259

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Clorox Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain polyethylene film in rolls on 15 June 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0920259 was made on 04 September 2009.  It declares that those certain polyethylene film in rolls are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0920259 is taken to have come into force on 15 June 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920259 was enacted in 2009 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the need for a streamlined process in reducing customs duties on specific imported goods, where no Australian-made alternatives exist. This instrument was introduced to provide a more efficient mechanism for granting tariff concessions, ensuring that businesses importing goods that are not produced domestically can benefit from lower customs duties, thereby potentially lowering costs and increasing competitiveness. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs in accordance with the Act, following an application from Clorox Australia for a tariff concession on certain polyethylene film in rolls. The policy objective of this measure is to support Australian industries by preventing the establishment of local production for goods that are already being imported, while also providing consumers with access to a broader range of competitively priced products.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920259, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific goods—in this case, certain polyethylene films in rolls—for which a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) was applied and approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Act allows for reduced customs duty rates on goods that meet the criteria for a TCO, provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This legislation directly benefits entities such as Clorox Australia, which applied for and received the concession, enabling them to import these goods duty-free. The instrument's reach is national, applying across Australia as per the federal jurisdiction of the Customs Act. Notably, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person adversely as it only applies prospectively from the date of the application, and it does not impose any new liabilities on individuals or entities beyond those already stipulated in the Act. The TCO was made effective from the date of application, 15 June 2009, and no submissions were received in opposition to it.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0920259 under the Customs Act 1901, specify the conditions and procedures for making a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) (sections 269C, 269F, 269P). Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods, provided the goods are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C, they must make a written order (a TCO) (section 269P). The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions if any person believes the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). The TCO in question, No. 0920259, was made on 4 September 2009, declaring that certain polyethylene film in rolls are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies, as no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus allowing these goods to be imported tariff-free. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, it requires the CEO to carefully evaluate each TCO application to ensure it meets the core criteria, particularly confirming that no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia at the time of the application (section 269C). Upon accepting an application as valid, the CEO must promptly publish a notice in the Gazette (subsection 269K(1)), soliciting any submissions from interested parties regarding the proposed TCO. Once the CEO decides to issue a TCO, they must do so in writing and specify the applicable tariff item (section 269P). Additionally, the Act ensures that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, except the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration, to their disadvantage or to impose any new liabilities (subsection 269S(1)). Importers of the goods subject to the TCO can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). Any breach of the provisions set out in the Customs Act 1901 may result in various penalties and consequences. For instance, incorrect or fraudulent applications for TCOs could lead to administrative actions, including fines or other penalties as determined by the relevant authorities. Additionally, any person found to be deliberately misapplying the provisions of the Act, including the misuse of TCOs, may face legal consequences. The exact penalties can vary depending on the nature and severity of the breach, but they could include substantial fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the specific offence and the jurisdiction in which it is prosecuted. It is important for all parties to comply with the requirements and obligations set out in the Act to avoid such adverse outcomes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.