Tariff Concession Order 0919527

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2011L01143 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0919527

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

IHI Engineeering Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain gas turbine intake evaporative coolers on 10 June 2009.

Instrument

TCO No 0919527 was made on 4 September 2009.  It declares that those certain gas turbine intake evaporative coolers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0919527 is taken to have come into force on 10 June 2009.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties in Australia. Specifically, Part XVA of the Act introduces a scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which can be applied for by individuals or entities to reduce the customs duty on certain goods. This scheme was introduced to address the gap in duty concessions for goods that are not produced domestically and have no suitable substitute, thereby encouraging trade and supporting economic growth. The policy objective is to provide relief to importers of goods that are not manufactured in Australia and to ensure that the Australian market remains competitive. The Customs Act 1901 empowers the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make TCOs, subject to certain criteria, which include verifying that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The TCO process includes a consultation period where objections can be raised, although in the case of TCO No 0919527, no submissions were received. The TCO applies retroactively from the date of the application, ensuring that importers are not disadvantaged and can potentially claim refunds for duties paid before the TCO was effective.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, through Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0919527, applies to the goods specified in the instrument, namely certain gas turbine intake evaporative coolers, and the parties involved in their importation. This Act operates on a Commonwealth level, with its provisions extending to the entire Australian jurisdiction. The instrument was made under section 269F of the Customs Act, which allows for the application for tariff concessions by a person, provided the goods do not fall under the exclusions specified in section 269SJ. The instrument was issued after the Chief Executive Officer of Customs determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, fulfilling the criteria set out in section 269C. The instrument does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth nor does it impose any liabilities on individuals, ensuring that rights as of the date of registration are preserved. Additionally, importers may apply for a refund of duties paid on these goods since the date the TCO is deemed to have come into force.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through Part XVA, as outlined in section 269F. A TCO results in a lower rate of customs duty for the specified goods. For an application to be considered, it must not pertain to goods listed in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for TCOs. If the CEO determines that the application is valid, they must then evaluate whether it meets the core criteria specified in section 269C. This assessment hinges on whether, at the time of application, no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Definitions for terms such as ‘goods produced in Australia’, ‘ordinary course of business’, and ‘substitutable goods’ are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively. If the application meets the core criteria, the CEO must issue a written TCO, declaring that the specified goods are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff), as per section 269P(3). The obligations under the Act require that upon receiving a valid TCO application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to submit reasons why the TCO should not be made, as stipulated in section 269K(1). In the case of TCO No. 0919527, concerning gas turbine intake evaporative coolers, the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia. Therefore, the CEO issued the TCO, making the general rate of duty on these goods free instead of the standard 5%, effective from the date the application was lodged, 10 June 2009. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person in respect of actions taken before the registration date. The Act also outlines potential consequences for non-compliance with the provisions regarding TCOs. While the explanatory statement does not specify particular offences or penalties, the Customs Act 1901 generally includes provisions for penalties and enforcement mechanisms in its other sections. Breaches of customs laws can result in significant fines and, in severe cases, criminal charges. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as determined by the relevant authorities. It is also worth noting that any party adversely affected by a TCO could potentially challenge the decision in court, although no such proceedings are mentioned in the explanatory statement.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.