EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913958
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Hma Fabrics applied for a TCO in respect of certain cotton combed yarn on 28 April 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0913958 was made on 17 July 2009. It declares that those certain cotton combed yarn are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0913958 is taken to have come into force on 28 April 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide for the administration of customs and excise duties and to regulate the importation and exportation of goods. The Act was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive framework governing the collection of customs duties and the regulation of international trade. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913958, enacted in 2009, is part of this framework, facilitating the application process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders allow for a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods, provided that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The policy objective of this instrument is to encourage the import of specific goods by reducing the associated customs duty, thereby potentially stimulating economic activity and supporting industries that rely on imported materials. The instrument was introduced without any submissions against it, indicating broad acceptance of the tariff concession's potential benefits.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913958 under the Customs Act 1901 applies specifically to the concession of customs duty rates for certain goods, in this case, certain cotton combed yarn. The Act permits the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) to a person who applies for it, provided that the goods in question do not fall under the prohibited category specified in section 269SJ of the Act and that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The concession applies to the goods as of the date the application was lodged, which in this instance was 28 April 2009. The geographic scope of this legislation is national, as it operates within the framework of Australian customs law. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this particular TCO, but the legislation does provide for the possibility of public submissions when a TCO application is made, although in this case, no submissions were received. The Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, although the specifics of such instruments are not detailed in the explanatory statement.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913958 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269P) establish the conditions and requirements for the application of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) for specific goods, in this case certain cotton combed yarn. Under section 269P(3), if the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they must issue a written order declaring that the goods in question are subject to a specified rate of duty in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For the cotton combed yarn, this means the goods are subject to a duty rate of free, as opposed to the general rate of 5% (section 269P). Section 269C sets out the core criteria, which require that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties involved include the necessity for Hma Fabrics to apply for a TCO if they wish to benefit from a lower rate of customs duty for their goods (section 269F). The CEO must then assess whether the application meets the core criteria, specifically ensuring that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia (section 269C). If the application is deemed valid, the CEO is required to issue a TCO and publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties (subsection 269K(1)). In this case, no submissions were received, allowing the TCO to proceed. The TCO also mandates that the rights of importers will be beneficially affected, enabling them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (subsection 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
The Act does not explicitly detail offences or penalties for breach of the TCO provisions. However, it does specify that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, to disadvantage them or impose liabilities for actions taken before the TCO's registration date (subsection 269S(1)). This ensures that the rights of importers are positively impacted, allowing them to claim refunds for duties paid on goods imported since the TCO's effective date. The absence of specific penalties for breaches suggests that the focus is on the procedural correctness of the application and assessment process rather than punitive measures for non-compliance.