EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913957
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Toyota Tsusho applied for a TCO in respect of certain motor vehicle inverter manipulators on 28 April 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0913957 was made on 17 July 2009. It declares that those certain motor vehicle inverter manipulators are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0913957 is taken to have come into force on 28 April 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Australian Parliament and establishes a framework for the administration of customs and excise in Australia. It includes provisions for the imposition of customs duty on imported goods and mechanisms for providing tariff relief. One of these mechanisms is the Tariff Concession Order (TCO), which allows for the reduction or exemption of customs duty on certain goods under specific conditions. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913957, made on 17 July 2009, addresses the need for tariff concessions on certain motor vehicle inverter manipulators by granting a free rate of duty for these goods. This instrument was created in response to an application by Toyota Tsusho, and it became effective from 28 April 2009, the date the application was lodged. The instrument was developed to ensure that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thereby meeting the core criteria for a TCO as outlined in section 269C of the Act. The policy objective of this instrument is to facilitate the importation of these goods without the imposition of customs duty, thereby potentially lowering costs for importers and supporting related industries.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0913957 applies to certain motor vehicle inverter manipulators and is governed under Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901. This Act applies to any individual or entity that imports these specified goods into Australia, effectively providing a concession on the customs duty for these goods when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs following an application by Toyota Tsusho on 28 April 2009 and came into effect on the same date. The geographical scope of this legislation is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia. It does not impose any liabilities on any person, including the Commonwealth, and does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which sets out the prescribed rates of duty. The CEO must make a written order declaring that the goods subject to the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies if satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) facilitates the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) as stated in section 269F. A TCO allows for a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods, provided the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C. Specifically, a TCO application is deemed to meet these criteria if, on the date of application, no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Substitutable goods, as defined in section 269D, are those produced domestically that can be used in a manner similar to the goods for which the TCO is sought. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is obligated to make a written order (TCO) if satisfied that the application meets these conditions, as per section 269P(3).
The obligations imposed on the parties by the Act require that the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions on the TCO application, as stated in subsection 269K(1). In this case, Toyota Tsusho applied for a TCO concerning certain motor vehicle inverter manipulators on 28 April 2009, and no submissions were received. The CEO issued TCO No. 0913957 on 17 July 2009, declaring that the specified goods are subject to a zero-duty rate under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The TCO came into effect on the day the application was lodged, 28 April 2009, as per subsection 269S(1). Importers can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since this effective date under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
Breaching the conditions set forth in the Customs Act 1901 can lead to various consequences. Although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in this context, the Act generally imposes civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. The maximum penalties can include fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach. The Act ensures that the rights of individuals are protected, and the TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities for actions taken before the effective date of the order. The TCO simply provides tariff concessions without retroactively affecting past actions.