EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0909591
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Andrew Engineering applied for a TCO in respect of certain bogie removal system on 20 March 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0909591 was made on 05 June 2009. It declares that those certain bogie removal system are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0909591 is taken to have come into force on 20 March 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the imposition of customs duty on imported goods, among other things. It was designed to address the need for regulating the import of goods into Australia and ensuring that appropriate duties are collected. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0909591, made under the Customs Act 1901, explains that the instrument was introduced to provide tariff concessions for specific goods. This instrument was enacted to facilitate tariff reductions for goods that are not produced domestically and are not substitutable by Australian-made alternatives, thereby encouraging the importation of these goods. The policy objective behind this instrument, as outlined in the explanatory statement, is to provide tariff concessions for certain bogie removal systems, reducing their customs duty rate to zero, thereby benefiting importers of these goods.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0909591 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods, in this case, certain bogie removal systems, as determined by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). The application of this instrument is limited to goods for which Andrew Engineering submitted an application on 20 March 2009, and it pertains to the reduction of customs duty from a general rate of 5% to free duty for these goods, contingent on the CEO's determination that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. This concession is governed by section 269F of the Act, which outlines the process for applying for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). The instrument's scope is further defined by the exclusion of goods specified in section 269SJ, which cannot be subject to a TCO. The instrument has a national reach, applying across Australia, and its effect is limited to the goods specified in the TCO, with no imposition of liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth. The TCO became effective from the date of the application, 20 March 2009, and does not affect the rights of persons as at the date of registration, ensuring that importers of these goods can apply for a refund of duty since the commencement date.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0909591 made under the Customs Act 1901 establishes tariff concessions for certain bogie removal systems. The main operative sections of this legislation (sections 269C, 269F, 269P(3) and 269S) work together to allow for the application, consideration, and granting of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Section 269F allows for applications to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for TCOs concerning specific goods, provided the goods are not those listed in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for TCOs. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C, a TCO is to be issued under section 269P(3). The TCO, in this case, specifies that the bogie removal systems are subject to the duty rate outlined in item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which is free of charge.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties involved are centred around the application and consideration process for TCOs. An applicant must ensure their application meets the core criteria, which requires that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. The CEO is obligated to consider each application and determine whether it meets the core criteria, and if so, to issue a TCO. Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from interested parties if a TCO application is accepted as valid, as per section 269K(1). In this instance, no submissions were received in response to the published notice.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and the associated regulations can result in various consequences. However, specific offences, penalties, or consequences are not detailed in the explanatory statement for this particular TCO. Generally, breaches of the Customs Act may result in civil or criminal penalties, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. Penalties may include fines, imprisonment, or both, as determined by the courts. The maximum penalties for breaches of the Customs Act can be significant, reflecting the seriousness with which the Australian Government treats customs-related offences.
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0909591 ensures that the rights of importers are beneficially affected by the TCO. Under the Customs (Tariff) Regulations 1993, importers of the affected goods can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO is taken to have come into force. Importantly, the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, ensuring that no individual or entity is disadvantaged by the concession. This aspect of the legislation highlights the balance the Act seeks to maintain between providing tariff relief and protecting the interests of all parties involved.