EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0909248
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Linak Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain electrical plug cables on 18 March 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0909248 was made on 12 June 2009. It declares that those certain electrical plug cables are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0909248 is taken to have come into force on 18 March 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Order No. 0909248, made under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to address the issue of applying tariff concessions to specific goods, in this case, certain electrical plug cables. Enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, the instrument was designed to lower the customs duty on these goods to zero, provided no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. This order was made in response to an application by Linak Australia on 18 March 2009. The policy objective of this concession is to encourage the importation of these specific goods by reducing the financial burden on importers, thereby potentially increasing their availability in the Australian market. The order came into effect on the date the application was lodged, and it ensures that the rights of importers are beneficially affected, allowing them to apply for a refund of any duty paid before the concession took effect.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which can be applied for by any person seeking a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods. The Act applies to individuals and entities involved in the importation of goods, particularly those seeking to benefit from a tariff concession on specific items, such as electrical plug cables. The geographical reach of this legislation is national, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act excludes certain goods from being subject to a TCO, as specified in section 269SJ, and mandates that a TCO application must meet core criteria, primarily that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The CEO of Customs has the authority to make written orders declaring that certain goods are subject to a prescribed rate in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The application process requires public notification, although in the case of TCO No. 0909248, no objections were received. The commencement date of the TCO aligns with the date of the application, ensuring that rights and liabilities are appropriately managed in relation to the concession.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, particularly under Part XVA, outlines the process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for reduced customs duties on specific goods. Section 269F allows for applications to be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO. If the CEO determines that the application is not for goods that are excluded by section 269SJ and meets the core criteria specified in section 269C, a TCO will be issued. According to section 269C, an application meets the core criteria if, on the date it was lodged, there were no substitutable goods produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This is further defined in sections 269B and 269E, which clarify the terms 'goods produced in Australia' and 'ordinary course of business', respectively, and section 269D, which explains 'substitutable goods' as those that could replace the goods in question.
Under this framework, the CEO must make a written order if satisfied that the application meets the core criteria. This is stipulated in subsection 269P(3) of the Act. In the case of TCO No. 0909248, the CEO issued the order on 12 June 2009, declaring that the specified electrical plug cables are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which imposes a free rate of duty on these goods. This decision was made because the CEO was convinced that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia. The general rate of duty for these goods would otherwise be 5%.
The obligations imposed by the Customs Act on parties applying for a TCO include ensuring that their application complies with the core criteria set out in section 269C. The CEO has the responsibility of reviewing applications and determining whether they meet the criteria, including verifying the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia as per section 269D. Furthermore, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties who may have reasons to oppose the TCO, as mandated by subsection 269K(1). This notice was published for TCO No. 0909248, but no submissions were received.
Regarding penalties and consequences, the Act does not specify particular penalties for non-compliance with the provisions for TCOs. However, breaches of other sections of the Customs Act could result in criminal or civil penalties. For example, knowingly making a false statement or representation in an application under the Act could lead to criminal charges, with potential penalties including fines and imprisonment. Civil penalties can also apply for breaches of the Act, which may include fines. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in other sections of the Customs Act.