EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0907878
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Eraring Energy applied for a TCO in respect of certain piston diaphragm slurry pumps on 06 March 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0907878 was made on 29 May 2009. It declares that those certain piston diaphragm slurry pumps are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0907878 is taken to have come into force on 06 March 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to establish a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties, and to provide mechanisms for the regulation of the importation and exportation of goods. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0907878, introduced in 2009, aims to address the issue of providing tariff concessions for specific goods, thereby potentially reducing the financial burden on importers and supporting certain industries by making imported goods more competitive. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs under the authority granted by the Customs Act 1901. The policy objective, as outlined in the Act, is to ensure that tariff concessions are granted when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, thus promoting economic efficiency and supporting industries where local production is not viable.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0907878, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific goods for which an applicant seeks a tariff concession order. The instrument pertains to certain piston diaphragm slurry pumps for which Eraring Energy applied for a tariff concession order on 6 March 2009. The order was issued on 29 May 2009, applying to these pumps by specifying them under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby granting them a zero rate of duty, in contrast to the general rate of 5%. The instrument is effective from the date the application was lodged, thus from 6 March 2009, and does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person. The CEO of Customs is mandated to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions if a tariff concession order application is accepted as valid, although no submissions were received in this case. The scope of the instrument is limited to the specified goods and does not extend to any other goods or entities unless they meet the criteria outlined under the Customs Act 1901.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Customs Act 1901, specifically concerning Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), are sections 269C, 269F, 269P, and 269S. Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of certain goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ, they must determine whether the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C. If the application satisfies these criteria, the CEO must issue a written TCO as per section 269P(3). In this case, TCO No. 0907878 was issued on 29 May 2009 for certain piston diaphragm slurry pumps, declaring that these goods are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, with a duty rate of free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, applicants must ensure their applications meet the core criteria specified in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made, as per subsection 269K(1). In this instance, no submissions were received. Furthermore, the CEO must decide on the application based on whether it meets the criteria outlined in the Act. Additionally, the Act ensures that the rights of importers will be beneficially affected, allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly state penalties for failing to comply with TCO requirements. However, general penalties for breaches of the Customs Act can include fines and imprisonment. For instance, under section 250 of the Act, a person can be fined up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisoned for five years, or both, for knowingly making a false statement or representation. The Act also provides for civil penalties, including financial penalties, for breaches related to customs duties and tariffs. It is crucial for applicants and importers to comply with the requirements of the Act to avoid any legal repercussions.
In summary, the Customs Act 1901, through sections 269C, 269F, 269P, and 269S, establishes the framework for TCOs, ensuring that goods eligible for such orders receive reduced duty rates. The CEO has the responsibility of evaluating applications and issuing TCOs when appropriate, while applicants must ensure their applications meet the stipulated criteria. The Act further mandates the publication of notices inviting submissions and guarantees that the rights of importers are protected. Failure to comply with the Act's provisions may result in significant civil and criminal penalties.