EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0903558
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Bluescope Steel applied for a TCO in respect of certain sinter plant drive induction motors on 03 February 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0903558 was made on 01 May 2009. It declares that those certain sinter plant drive induction motors are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0903558 is taken to have come into force on 03 February 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0903558, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the need for reduced customs duties on specific goods not produced in Australia, thereby encouraging the import of these goods. This instrument was introduced to facilitate tariff concessions for goods where no suitable Australian alternatives exist. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who is empowered under the Act to assess and approve tariff concession orders that meet the core criteria, such as the non-existence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This legislative instrument aims to support industries by reducing the cost of importing necessary goods, ultimately benefiting importers who can apply for duty refunds on eligible goods imported since the effective date of the concession.
The instrument, gazetted on 1 May 2009, applies to certain sinter plant drive induction motors, granting them a duty-free status by aligning them with item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The Customs Act 1901 mandates public consultation on tariff concession applications, although in this instance, no submissions were received. The tariff concession is effective from 3 February 2009, the date the application was lodged, without retroactively affecting the rights or imposing liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) for specified goods, which can lower the rate of customs duty on those goods. The Act applies to any person who wishes to apply for a TCO, and it covers goods that are not produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business and do not have substitutable goods produced domestically as outlined in sections 269SJ, 269C, 269D, 269E, and 269P of the Act. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across Australia as it is a Commonwealth Act. TCOs are subject to certain exclusions, particularly those goods listed in section 269SJ which cannot be subject to a TCO. The application process includes a mandatory publication in the Gazette inviting objections, although in the case of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0903558, no objections were received. The TCOs are generally effective from the date of application lodgement as per section 269S(1) of the Act. Furthermore, the TCOs do not affect any existing rights or impose new liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth, ensuring that the rights of importers are beneficially affected by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 0903558, issued under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269F), pertains to certain sinter plant drive induction motors. This instrument declares that these motors are goods to which a particular tariff item applies (section 269P(3)), thereby granting them tariff concessions. Specifically, the TCO establishes that these motors are subject to a duty-free rate instead of the general rate of 5% (section 269P(3)). This order was issued on 1 May 2009 by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), following an application by Bluescope Steel on 3 February 2009. The CEO determined that the application met the core criteria, which include ensuring that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application (section 269C).
Under the Customs Act 1901, the CEO has a duty to assess whether an application for a TCO meets the core criteria, specifically checking that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (section 269C). This involves a rigorous evaluation to confirm that the goods in question cannot be replaced by Australian-made products. Additionally, the CEO is mandated to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, inviting any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to submit their views (subsection 269K(1)). The CEO must then consider these submissions before making a decision. In this instance, no submissions were received in response to the published notice.
Breaching the requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901 may lead to various consequences. The Act does not specify particular offences or penalties for failing to comply with the TCO provisions. However, general principles under Australian law apply, and any breaches of the Act could potentially result in civil or criminal penalties, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. These penalties can range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the nature and extent of the violation.
The TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration in a way that would disadvantage that person or impose liabilities (subsection 269S(2)). This ensures that the rights of existing parties are preserved and that no new liabilities are created for those who acted in good faith before the TCO came into effect. Importers, however, stand to benefit from the TCO, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO was taken to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The TCO itself does not impose any new liabilities on any person.