EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0902609
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Mr Scaffold applied for a TCO in respect of certain scaffolding components on 27 January 2009.
Instrument
TCO No 0902609 was made on 24 April 2009. It declares that those certain scaffolding components are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0902609 is taken to have come into force on 27 January 2009.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0902609, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to provide relief to importers by reducing or eliminating customs duties on specified goods, in this case certain scaffolding components, thereby addressing the issue of high import costs for these goods. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who must decide whether applications for tariff concessions meet the core criteria set out in the Customs Act. In this instance, the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia for the scaffolding components in question, thereby satisfying the core criteria. The instrument ensures that the rights of importers are positively affected, allowing them to apply for refunds of duties paid on these goods since the day the tariff concession was taken to have come into force, while ensuring no new liabilities are imposed on anyone other than the Commonwealth.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, facilitates the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This instrument applies to any person or entity seeking to import goods that qualify for a lower rate of customs duty, provided these goods are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act as ineligible for TCOs. The application process requires the CEO to ascertain that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application is lodged. Once the core criteria are met, the CEO issues a TCO, effectively reducing the duty rate for the specified goods to zero, as opposed to the general rate. The TCO applies from the date the application is lodged, with no retrospective effect on existing transactions or liabilities, though it does allow for duty refunds for imports since that date. The instrument is a Commonwealth regulation, extending its reach across Australia, and it does not impose any additional liabilities on individuals or entities aside from the Commonwealth.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) establishes a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) as per section 269F (1). This process is particularly relevant for section 269C of the Act, which stipulates that a TCO application is deemed to meet the core criteria if, on the date the application is submitted, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Furthermore, section 269B clarifies that the definitions of "goods produced in Australia", "ordinary course of business", and "substitutable goods" are provided by sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved, primarily the CEO, include assessing the validity of TCO applications against the core criteria set out in section 269C. Upon satisfying that the application complies with these criteria, the CEO is mandated by section 269P(3) to issue a written order declaring the goods subject of the application as goods to which a specified item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies. This declaration effectively reduces the customs duty on these goods, as illustrated in the case of Mr Scaffold's application for scaffolding components, where the duty rate was reduced from 5% to free under TCO No. 0902609.
The Act also stipulates procedural requirements for the CEO, as outlined in section 269K(1). Once a TCO application is deemed valid, the CEO must promptly publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to submit any objections to the TCO. In the case of TCO No. 0902609, the CEO did not receive any submissions, which facilitated the smooth issuance of the order. The commencement of a TCO is governed by section 269S(1), which specifies that a TCO is effective from the date the application was lodged. Thus, TCO No. 0902609 is effective from 27 January 2009. Importantly, section 269S(1) also ensures that the TCO does not adversely affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth regarding actions taken before the registration date.
Regarding the consequences of non-compliance or breach, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for failing to adhere to the TCO provisions. However, the Act ensures that the rights of importers are protected, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. This provision indirectly serves as a safeguard against any potential misuse or improper application of the TCO scheme.