EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0843479
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Beaver Brands applied for a TCO in respect of certain spanner socket sets on 11 December 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0843479 was made on 25 March 2009. It declares that those certain spanner socket sets are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0843479 is taken to have come into force on 11 December 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0843479, enacted in 2009 under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the need to provide tariff concessions for specific imported goods, in this case, certain spanner socket sets. The Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that apply lower rates of customs duty to goods that meet specific criteria, including the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This mechanism is intended to support industries by reducing import costs for goods that cannot be locally produced, thereby fostering competitiveness and economic efficiency. The policy objective is to facilitate the importation of goods that are not produced domestically, thus benefiting businesses and consumers by lowering the cost of these imported items. The instrument was introduced following an application from Beaver Brands and, after no objections were received, it came into force on the date the application was lodged.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as amended, provides for the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to certain goods to reduce the rate of customs duty. Specifically, under section 269F, any person may apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs for a TCO in respect of goods, provided the application is not for goods listed in section 269SJ, which cannot be subject to a TCO. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, which primarily include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia, a TCO is issued under section 269P(3). The instrument applies to the specific goods identified in the application, and in this instance, TCO No. 0843479 pertains to certain spanner socket sets. This order was made on 25 March 2009, declaring that the specified spanner socket sets are subject to a reduced duty rate as outlined in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The TCO applies nationally and has no stated exclusions beyond the criteria specified within the Customs Act. The TCO came into force on 11 December 2008, the date the application was lodged, and does not affect any pre-existing rights or impose any liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, particularly Part XVA, governs the process through which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued. Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO determines that the application is valid and does not pertain to goods specified in section 269SJ, they must then assess whether the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C. For a TCO application to meet these criteria, no substitutable goods can be produced in Australia on the day the application is lodged, as per section 269C. Definitions for terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F, respectively.
Upon satisfying the core criteria, the CEO is obligated to issue a written order under subsection 269P(3), declaring the goods in question as eligible for a prescribed tariff concession. This was the case for TCO No. 0843479, which was issued on 25 March 2009 for certain spanner socket sets, applying the free rate of duty under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. Additionally, subsection 269K(1) requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any person to lodge a submission if they believe the TCO should not be granted. In this instance, no submissions were received, and thus the TCO was made effective from 11 December 2008, the date the application was lodged as per subsection 269S(1).
In terms of obligations, the CEO must ensure that the application for a TCO complies with all relevant provisions and that the core criteria are met. They are also required to publish a notice in the Gazette and consider any submissions received. The CEO’s decision to grant a TCO is contingent upon satisfying these procedural and substantive requirements. Once a TCO is issued, it affects the duty rates applicable to the specified goods, and importers can apply for a refund of duty paid on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO. The TCO does not impose any new liabilities or disadvantage existing rights as per the provisions outlined in the Act.
Should a party breach the requirements set out in the Customs Act 1901 or misuse the provisions of a TCO, they may face penalties. The Act does not specify maximum penalties for breaches related to TCOs, but general penalties for customs-related offences can include fines and imprisonment. For instance, misleading or deceptive conduct under section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law can incur significant penalties. Additionally, civil and administrative actions can be pursued for non-compliance with customs regulations, which may result in financial penalties or other remedies as determined by the court.