EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833885
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Scott Chemicals Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain pigment preparations on 02 October 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0833885 was made on 19 December 2008. It declares that those certain pigment preparations are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0833885 is taken to have come into force on 02 October 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833885 was enacted under the Customs Act 1901 to provide relief from customs duty for specific goods not produced in Australia, addressing a gap in the availability of certain products within the domestic market. This legislative instrument was introduced to facilitate access to goods that are essential but not manufactured locally, thereby promoting competition and consumer choice without placing undue burdens on the Commonwealth or existing stakeholders. The Tariff Concession Order (TCO) was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who determined that the application for tariff concession met the core criteria outlined in the Act. The policy objective was to ensure that the application of tariff concessions did not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and did not impose liabilities on any person, while beneficially affecting the rights of importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on imported goods.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833885 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to the concession of customs duty on certain pigment preparations, specifically those applied for by Scott Chemicals Pty Ltd on 2 October 2008. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs on 19 December 2008, following a determination that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, satisfying the core criteria under section 269C of the Act. This means that the application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) was valid and the CEO proceeded to issue a TCO that declares these pigment preparations as goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies, thus making the duty rate for these goods free instead of the general rate of 5%. The TCO is effective from the date the application was lodged, 2 October 2008, and it does not disadvantage any person by affecting their rights as at the date of registration or impose any liabilities on anyone for actions taken prior to the registration. Instead, it provides a benefit to importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, outlines the process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which are issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) (sections 269F and 269S). A TCO can be applied for by a person seeking a lower rate of customs duty on specific goods (section 269F). The CEO must consider whether the goods are eligible under section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, and if not, the CEO must determine if the application meets the core criteria (section 269C). The core criteria are satisfied if, on the date of application, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (section 269C). Definitions for "goods produced in Australia", "ordinary course of business" and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269P respectively.
The obligations under this Act include the requirement for the CEO to issue a written order (a TCO) if satisfied that the application meets the core criteria (section 269P(3)). This process was followed by Scott Chemicals Pty Ltd, which applied for a TCO for certain pigment preparations on 2 October 2008. The CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia and thus issued TCO No. 0833885 on 19 December 2008, which declared that the pigment preparations were subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, with the general rate of duty on these goods being 5% and the rate for the goods subject to the TCO being free (section 269P(3)). Additionally, as per section 269K(1), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made. No submissions were received in response to this notice.
The commencement of the TCO is effective from the date the application was lodged, which is 2 October 2008 for TCO No. 0833885 (subsection 269S(1)). The TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth as at the date of registration to the extent of disadvantaging that person or imposing liabilities on them for actions taken before the registration date (subsection 269S(2)). However, importers of the goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is deemed to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). Importantly, the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Breach of the provisions in the Customs Act 1901 can result in various penalties and consequences. The Act includes both civil and criminal penalties for offences such as smuggling, fraudulent importation, or failure to comply with the Act’s requirements. For example, section 223A imposes a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for five years, or both, for serious breaches like smuggling. Similarly, under section 228, failure to comply with certain requirements can lead to penalties of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for two years, or both. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the offence as outlined in the Act.