EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833361
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Atdec Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain flat screen display stands on 30 September 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0833361 was made on 19 December 2008. It declares that those certain flat screen display stands are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0833361 is taken to have come into force on 30 September 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the importation and exportation of goods, among other things, and includes provisions for the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The 2009 Explanatory Statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833361, made under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the gap in tariff concessions for certain goods. This legislative instrument was introduced to provide tariff concessions for specific goods that are not produced domestically and thus are not subject to domestic competition. The policy objective, as outlined in the explanatory statement, is to ensure that the application for a TCO meets the core criteria and to facilitate the importation of goods that are not produced in Australia, thereby benefiting importers by potentially reducing the duty on these goods. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is responsible for making the TCO if satisfied that the application meets the criteria and no submissions object to the concession.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833361 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods, namely certain flat screen display stands, and governs the concession of customs duty on these goods. The instrument was made in response to an application by Atdec Pty Ltd, and it came into effect on 30 September 2008, the date the application was lodged. The application process and decision-making are overseen by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), who must ensure that the goods in question are not substitutable with any produced in Australia and meet the core criteria set out in the Act. The geographic reach of this instrument is national, applying across Australia. Importantly, the instrument does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on persons for actions taken prior to its registration. Importers of the specified goods will benefit from this instrument, potentially applying for a refund of duty paid on imports since the date the TCO was deemed to come into force.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0833361, as issued under the Customs Act 1901, specifies the application of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) in relation to certain flat screen display stands. According to section 269P(3) of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must make a written order (the TCO) if satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, as outlined in section 269C. This involves confirming that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged, with "substitutable goods" defined in section 269D of the Act.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved, particularly the CEO, include verifying that the application for a TCO is valid and does not pertain to goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, as specified in section 269SJ. Once an application is accepted as valid, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any person who might have objections to the TCO to submit their views, as stipulated in subsection 269K(1) of the Act. In this case, no objections were received, leading to the issuance of the TCO on 19 December 2008.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 can result in various consequences. Under section 270 of the Act, breaches of the Act can lead to civil and criminal penalties. For instance, an individual or entity found guilty of making a false statement or representation in an application for a TCO can be subject to fines or imprisonment, as specified in the relevant sections of the Act. In this instance, however, the TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on anyone other than the Commonwealth, and it does not affect rights as they stood on the date of registration. Importers of the affected goods may apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO was taken to have come into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.