Tariff Concession Order 0832574

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2009L00781 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0832574

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Mountain Wave Investment Trust applied for a TCO in respect of certain vertical helicopter saw on 24 September 2008.

Instrument

TCO No 0832574 was made on 12 December 2008.  It declares that those certain vertical helicopter saw are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0832574 is taken to have come into force on 24 September 2008.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to facilitate and regulate the administration of customs and excise in Australia. In particular, Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) were introduced to provide relief from customs duties on certain imported goods under specific conditions. This instrument, F2009L00781, known as Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0832574, was established to address the gap in tariff concessions for goods where no substitutable products are produced domestically. This mechanism was designed to encourage the importation of goods that are not locally produced, thereby fostering competition and potentially lowering prices for consumers. The instrument was issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who is mandated to evaluate applications against the criteria outlined in the Customs Act 1901. The overarching policy objective is to ensure that TCOs are granted only when it is clear that no similar goods are manufactured in Australia, thus supporting the economic rationale behind tariff concessions.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). This Act applies to any person or entity seeking a reduction in customs duty on certain goods through the application process outlined in section 269F. The TCO applies to specific goods for which an application has been made and approved by the CEO, provided the goods do not fall under the list of excluded items specified in section 269SJ of the Act. The application process hinges on the core criteria set out in section 269C, which requires the CEO to determine that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of the application. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it applies across all jurisdictions within Australia. The instrument, TCO No 0832574, was made on 12 December 2008 and applies to certain vertical helicopter saws, setting their duty rate at free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%. This TCO does not affect existing rights or impose liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth and comes into force on the date the application was lodged, in this case, 24 September 2008. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions on the TCO application, although in this instance, no submissions were received.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0832574, under the Customs Act 1901, establish the legal framework for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) (section 269F). This process involves an application to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), who must then determine whether the application meets the core criteria (section 269C). If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, a TCO is issued, specifying the goods to which the concession applies (subsection 269P(3)). Under this Act, the CEO is required to evaluate the application to ensure it pertains to goods that are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for TCOs. The CEO must ascertain that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time the application is lodged, as defined by section 269D (goods produced in Australia), section 269E (ordinary course of business), and section 269F (substitutable goods). This means the goods in question must not have an Australian alternative that serves the same purpose or function. If these conditions are met, the CEO must make a written TCO, as specified in section 269P(3). The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties or entities it governs include the requirement for applicants to ensure their applications meet the criteria for a TCO. The CEO must rigorously assess each application to verify that the goods in question are not produced in Australia and do not have a substitutable alternative. Once a TCO is issued, importers can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the date the TCO is deemed to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from interested parties, although in this case, no submissions were received (subsection 269K(1)). For breaches of the conditions set out in the Customs Act 1901, various penalties and consequences may apply. However, the specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach are not detailed in the explanatory statement. Generally, breaches of customs regulations can result in fines, imprisonment, or other penalties as determined by the courts, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.