EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0829717
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Downer Edi Works Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain mixing tower module on 05 September 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0829717 was made on 28 November 2008. It declares that those certain mixing tower module are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0829717 is taken to have come into force on 05 September 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties, including the process for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders allow for the reduction or exemption of customs duty on specific goods under certain conditions. The Act was designed to facilitate trade by providing a mechanism for tariff concessions, which can help reduce costs for importers and potentially stimulate economic activity by making imported goods more affordable. The policy objective underpinning the creation of TCOs is to ensure that Australian consumers and businesses have access to competitively priced imported goods, thereby supporting fair trade practices and economic growth. In accordance with the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs is responsible for assessing applications for TCOs and determining whether they meet the stipulated criteria, which include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0829717, pursuant to the Customs Act 1901, pertains to applications for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which may be made by any person seeking to reduce the customs duty on specific goods. The Act applies to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs who is responsible for deciding whether an application meets the core criteria for a TCO, specifically when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The application process involves meeting the statutory requirements outlined in sections 269C and 269D of the Act, which detail the conditions under which a TCO can be granted. The TCO in question, No. 0829717, applies to certain mixing tower modules and became effective from the date the application was lodged, 5 September 2008. The instrument does not extend to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which cannot be subject to a TCO, and it does not affect the rights of persons as at the date of registration to disadvantage them or impose any liabilities in respect of actions taken prior to the registration. Any person who considers that there are reasons why a TCO should not be made can lodge a submission with the CEO, although no submissions were received in this case.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation (F2009L00325) concern the process and criteria for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods. If the application is not in relation to goods specified in section 269SJ, the CEO must decide if it meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, a written order is made under subsection 269P(3) declaring the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette under subsection 269K(1) inviting submissions on the application, although in this case, no submissions were received. The TCO is taken to have come into force on the day the application was lodged, as per subsection 269S(1).
The obligations imposed by this Act on parties governed by it primarily involve the application process for TCOs. An applicant must ensure their application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act and that they meet the core criteria set out in section 269C. The CEO has the responsibility to decide whether an application meets the core criteria, make the TCO if it does, and publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions on the application. The CEO in this instance did not receive any submissions in response to the notice. The Act also requires the CEO to ensure that the rights of persons, other than the Commonwealth, are not disadvantaged or that they are not imposed liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted before the TCO registration date.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences mentioned in this legislation for breaches of the TCO process or the criteria. However, the legislation ensures that the rights of importers will be beneficially affected, allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force, under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. Importantly, the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person. The Act aims to provide a streamlined process for obtaining tariff concessions while ensuring that the rights of various parties are protected.