EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0827990
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Jb Macmahon Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain wine corks unscrambling and or orientating machines on 25 August 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0827990 was made on 14 November 2008. It declares that those certain wine corks unscrambling and or orientating machines are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0827990 is taken to have come into force on 25 August 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, was supplemented by Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0827990 in 2008. This instrument was introduced to address the specific needs of certain businesses by providing tariff concessions on particular goods. The problem it aimed to resolve was the potential economic disadvantage faced by Australian businesses that required importing specific goods not produced domestically, thereby allowing for lower customs duty rates and enhancing the competitiveness of these businesses. The policy objective, as stated, was to ensure that the application of tariff concessions would not disadvantage existing rights or impose new liabilities on any party, while beneficially affecting the rights of importers by allowing them to apply for refunds of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the concession.
The explanatory statement outlines that the Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 0827990 was made on 14 November 2008, concerning certain wine corks unscrambling and orientating machines. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus meeting the core criteria under the Customs Act 1901. Consequently, the TCO was published in the Gazette, and no objections were received, leading to its immediate effect from 25 August 2008, the date the application was lodged. The TCO provided a tariff concession, setting the duty rate for the specified machines at free, down from the general rate of 5%. This legislative measure ensures that importers of such goods can apply for duty refunds and that no existing rights or liabilities are adversely affected.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which lower the rate of customs duty on certain goods. This provision applies to any individual or entity that wishes to apply for a TCO, subject to the criteria set out in the Act. The application must not be for goods specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for tariff concessions, and the application must meet the core criteria outlined in section 269C, notably that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. The scope of the Act extends to the entire Commonwealth of Australia, applying uniformly across all states and territories. Any orders made under this Act, such as TCO No. 0827990 concerning wine corks unscrambling and orientating machines, are effective from the date the application is lodged, not the date of the order itself. Importantly, these orders do not retroactively affect the rights of any person, except the Commonwealth, nor impose liabilities on anyone in respect of actions taken before the order’s effective date.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through section 269F, enabling the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to grant lower rates of customs duty on certain goods. An applicant can request a TCO for goods not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for TCOs. The CEO must ensure the application meets the core criteria, as outlined in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was made. Definitions for terms such as "goods produced in Australia" (section 269D), "ordinary course of business" (section 269E) and "substitutable goods" (section 269D) are provided in the Act.
The obligations imposed by the Act require that the CEO must decide on the validity of a TCO application and publish a notice in the Gazette if the application is accepted as valid, inviting submissions from any interested parties. In the case of TCO No. 0827990, the CEO published the notice but did not receive any submissions. The TCO itself takes effect from the date the application was lodged, as stipulated in section 269S(1). This TCO does not disadvantage any person, except the Commonwealth, or impose any liabilities on any person for actions taken before the TCO's effective date. Instead, it benefits importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date.
The Act does not explicitly state offences or penalties for breaching the TCO provisions. However, any breach of the Customs Act 1901, including non-compliance with the TCO provisions, could lead to civil or criminal penalties as outlined in the Act and related regulations. The severity of penalties would depend on the nature and extent of the breach, with potential civil penalties including fines and criminal penalties including imprisonment, depending on the specific breach and the discretion of the courts.