EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0827978
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain poultry carcass rehanger on 25 August 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0827978 was made on 14 November 2008. It declares that those certain poultry carcass rehanger are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0827978 is taken to have come into force on 25 August 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for the regulation of customs and excise through various legislative instruments, including Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders provide reduced rates of customs duty for specified goods. Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0827978, introduced on 14 November 2008, was made under section 269F of the Customs Act 1901 to address a specific need identified by Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited. The company applied for a TCO on 25 August 2008 for certain poultry carcass rehangers, which are now subject to a zero rate of duty rather than the general 5% duty. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application, thereby meeting the core criteria set out in section 269C of the Act. This concession benefits importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on imports since the effective date of the TCO, which is 25 August 2008, as per the Regulations under section 126(1)(r).
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, provides the framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for reduced customs duty rates on certain goods. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) has the authority to make these orders, provided that the application for a TCO meets the core criteria outlined in the Act. An application is considered to meet these criteria if, on the date of application, there are no goods produced in Australia that can be substituted for the goods in question, and these goods are produced in the ordinary course of business. Notably, the Act excludes certain goods from eligibility for a TCO, as specified in section 269SJ. The scope of the Act applies to any person or entity that seeks a tariff concession on goods, and the application is subject to national jurisdiction under the Commonwealth of Australia. The TCO No. 0827978, which concerns certain poultry carcass rehangers, exemplifies this process and came into force on the date of the application, 25 August 2008. Importantly, this order does not retroactively affect any rights or impose any liabilities on parties other than the Commonwealth, and importers of the specified goods are entitled to apply for a refund of duty paid since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, outlines the process for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which a lower rate of customs duty applies to certain goods. Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO. For the CEO to consider the application, it must not be for goods specified in section 269SJ, which lists those ineligible for TCOs. The CEO must assess if the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C, which is satisfied if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Definitions for terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B respectively. If the CEO determines that the application meets these criteria, a written TCO is issued under section 269P(3), specifying the reduced duty rate for the goods.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved include the requirement for applicants to ensure their goods meet the eligibility criteria for a TCO, particularly that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The CEO must review applications to confirm they are not for ineligible goods and that the core criteria are met. Upon acceptance of a TCO application as valid, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any person who believes the TCO should not be made to submit their reasons. In the case of TCO No. 0827978, the CEO did not receive any submissions, allowing the process to proceed without opposition. The TCO does not disadvantage any person's rights as at the date of registration, and it does not impose any liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth. Importers of the specified goods can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is taken to have come into force.
The Act does not explicitly state offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the TCO provisions. However, non-compliance with the conditions set forth in the TCO or the Customs Act could potentially lead to legal actions under general customs laws, which may include penalties such as fines or other enforcement actions as provided by the broader customs legislation. The precise penalties for any breaches would depend on the specific nature of the breach and the applicable sections of the Customs Act or related regulations.