EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0818098
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Arlec Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain movement activated lights on 14 July 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0818098 was made on 08 October 2008. It declares that those certain movement activated lights are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0818098 is taken to have come into force on 14 July 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0818098, made under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to address the need for tariff concessions on specific goods imported into Australia. This instrument was enacted to provide a lower rate of customs duty on certain movement activated lights, as applied by Arlec Australia Pty Ltd, by way of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). The problem it sought to resolve was the potential economic disadvantage to consumers and businesses due to high customs duty rates on such goods, which could have been mitigated through tariff concessions. The instrument was developed and enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, acting under the authority provided by the Customs Act 1901, and it aligns with the policy objective of facilitating the import of goods by reducing associated customs duties where appropriate.
The Customs Act 1901, administered by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the application and administration of customs duties and tariff concessions. The explanatory statement for this particular instrument indicates that it was created in response to an application from Arlec Australia Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on movement activated lights, which were not being produced in Australia at the time of application. The policy objective here is to ensure that consumers and businesses are not subjected to undue economic burden by high customs duties, thereby promoting fair trade practices and economic efficiency. The instrument ensures that no existing rights or liabilities are adversely affected, thereby maintaining legal certainty for all parties involved.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0818098, made under the Customs Act 1901, pertains to the application process and issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for specific goods. This legislation applies to entities or individuals who seek to import certain goods into Australia and benefit from reduced customs duties. The Act's scope encompasses any applicant who meets the core criteria outlined in the Act, specifically where no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The TCO, once issued, applies to the specific goods detailed in the Instrument, in this case, certain movement activated lights. Geographically, the Act operates under Commonwealth jurisdiction, influencing customs practices across the nation. The Act does not impose any liabilities on individuals or entities and does not disadvantage any person's pre-existing rights, although it may provide benefits such as duty refunds for importers of the specified goods. The application of the Act may be extended or detailed through subordinate instruments, which may provide further clarification or additional criteria for specific cases.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0818098, under the Customs Act 1901, establish a mechanism for granting tariff concessions on specified goods. Section 269F allows an individual or entity to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) in respect of goods. This application process is contingent upon the goods not being specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for a TCO. Upon receiving an application, the CEO assesses whether it meets the core criteria set out in section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. If these criteria are satisfied, the CEO must issue a TCO as per section 269P(3), specifying the applicable duty rate from the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties involved are primarily procedural. The CEO of Customs is mandated to review applications for TCOs and determine their eligibility based on the specified criteria. The applicant must ensure their application is made in respect of goods that are not listed in section 269SJ and that the goods in question are not substitutable by any goods produced in Australia on the application date. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette (subsection 269K(1)) inviting public submissions if the application is accepted as valid, although in this case, no submissions were received. The TCO, once issued, provides specific tariff concessions to the goods listed, affecting the rights of importers by allowing them to claim duty refunds for goods imported from the date the TCO is deemed to have come into effect.
The Act does not specify any direct offences or penalties for breaches of the TCO provisions. However, general provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and associated regulations may apply to any non-compliance with customs laws, which could lead to civil or criminal penalties. For example, misleading or fraudulent statements made in a TCO application could result in fines or imprisonment under the general customs fraud provisions. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they could include fines up to several thousand dollars and imprisonment for significant offences. It is important for applicants and the CEO to adhere strictly to the legislative requirements to avoid any potential legal repercussions.