Tariff Concession Order 0817139

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2008L04197 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0817139

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Syngenta Corp Protection applied for a TCO in respect of certain fenoxycarb insecticides on 11 July 2008.

Instrument

TCO No 0817139 was made on 03 October 2008.  It declares that those certain fenoxycarb insecticides are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0817139 is taken to have come into force on 11 July 2008.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides for the establishment of a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a streamlined process to grant tariff concessions on certain goods, thereby encouraging trade and economic growth. Section 269F of the Act allows for applications to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods, with the primary objective being to reduce customs duty for specific goods if they meet the core criteria outlined in the Act, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This mechanism is designed to benefit the rights of importers and potentially reduce the financial burden of importing certain goods. Instrument TCO No. 0817139 exemplifies this process, providing a tariff concession for certain fenoxycarb insecticides, reducing the general rate of duty from 5% to free, effective from the date the application was lodged.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, outlines the procedure for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which apply to goods for which a lower rate of customs duty is designated. The Act applies to any person who wishes to apply for a TCO for goods not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. This legislation is enacted at the Commonwealth level and therefore has a national reach. The core criteria for approving a TCO application, as per section 269C of the Act, are that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. The Act also provides detailed definitions for terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" to ensure clarity and precise application of the concession scheme. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs is responsible for making written orders declaring that the goods subject to the TCO application are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby reducing the rate of duty for these goods. The application of this Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may specify additional criteria or conditions for the concession orders.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, establishes a framework through which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). Section 269F of the Act permits an individual or entity to apply to the CEO for a TCO concerning specific goods. If the CEO determines that the application does not pertain to goods outlined in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for a TCO, the CEO must assess whether the application fulfills the core criteria outlined in section 269C. A TCO application is considered to meet the core criteria if, on the date of submission, no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia as a regular part of business operations. The terms "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are further defined in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F, respectively. Under section 269P(3) of the Act, if the CEO is satisfied that the TCO application meets the core criteria, they are required to issue a written order (TCO) declaring that the goods in question are subject to a specified item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This declaration effectively reduces the applicable customs duty rate for those goods. In the case of Syngenta Corp Protection's application for a TCO concerning certain fenoxycarb insecticides, the CEO issued TCO No. 0817139 on 3 October 2008, confirming that these insecticides were subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Tariff. Consequently, the general rate of duty, which stood at 5%, was waived for these goods. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. For applicants, it is necessary to submit a valid TCO application to the CEO and ensure that it complies with the core criteria. Upon acceptance of the application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to submit objections if they believe the TCO should not be granted. This process ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for public input. In this instance, no submissions were received in response to the notice. The TCO comes into effect on the day the application is lodged, as per subsection 269S(1) of the Act, and in this case, 11 July 2008. In terms of potential breaches and penalties, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for failing to comply with the TCO provisions. However, non-compliance with customs regulations generally can lead to various penalties, including fines and imprisonment. The precise penalties would depend on the specific nature of the breach and would be subject to other relevant laws and regulations governing customs and trade.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Tariff Concession Order
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.