EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0807796
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain reduction cell collector bar on 12 May 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0807796 was made on 04 August 2008. It declares that those certain reduction cell collector bars are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0807796 is taken to have come into force on 12 May 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework for the imposition of tariffs on imported goods. This legislative instrument, specifically Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0807796, was introduced to address the gap in tariff concessions for certain goods, facilitating their entry into Australia under more favourable terms. This instrument was enacted to provide relief to importers and manufacturers by reducing or eliminating customs duties on specified goods, provided that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The policy objective, as per the Act, is to ensure that tariff concessions are granted in circumstances where such concessions will not undermine domestic production. The Tariff Concession Order No. 0807796 was made on 4 August 2008, following an application by Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited for a tariff concession on certain reduction cell collector bars, and was effective from 12 May 2008.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that can apply lower rates of customs duty on certain goods. This legislation applies to any individual or entity seeking to import goods into Australia that could potentially benefit from a reduced customs duty rate through a TCO. The scope of the Act is national, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia, and it affects the customs duties on imported goods. The application process requires the applicant to demonstrate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, meaning that the imported goods have no domestic equivalents that could serve the same purpose. The TCO scheme does not apply to certain goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act. The application of the Act can be extended or refined through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and orders that provide further details on the process and criteria for TCOs. The Explanatory Statement for Instrument No. 0807796, which was made on 04 August 2008, demonstrates the application of the Act in a specific case involving Rio Tinto Aluminium Limited and certain reduction cell collector bars. This TCO was effective from 12 May 2008, the date the application was lodged, and it does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities in respect of actions taken before the registration date.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) (sections 269C and 269F). These orders apply a lower rate of customs duty to specified goods, provided the goods are not listed in section 269SJ, which outlines those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. If a TCO application is made and the CEO is satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the date the application was lodged, the CEO must decide if the application meets the core criteria (section 269C). If the application does meet these criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) (section 269P(3)). For example, TCO No. 0807796 was made on 4 August 2008, declaring that certain reduction cell collector bars are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) applies, due to the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This results in a rate of duty of free, down from the general rate of 5%.
Entities and individuals applying for a TCO must ensure their applications meet the core criteria set out in the Act. They must provide sufficient information to demonstrate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia on the date of the application. Additionally, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to lodge a submission if they believe the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). In this case, no submissions were received. The TCO comes into force on the date the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1)). For TCO No. 0807796, this date is 12 May 2008. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of a person as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901 or the associated regulations can result in significant consequences. For instance, if an entity or individual knowingly makes a false statement in an application for a TCO, they may be subject to civil or criminal penalties. Under section 278 of the Act, a person who contravenes a provision of the Act may be liable to a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to two years, or both, for a single offence. Additionally, entities may face fines up to 525,000 penalty units under section 278A for multiple offences. These penalties underscore the importance of ensuring compliance with the Act and its associated regulations when applying for a TCO.