EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0806256
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
CSR Building Products Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain coating booths on 1 May 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0806256 was made on 11 July 2008. It declares that those certain coating booths are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0806256 is taken to have come into force on 1 May 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to facilitate the administration of customs and excise duties. A specific feature of the Act is the Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) mechanism, introduced to address the need for tariff relief on certain goods under particular conditions. TCOs provide a lower rate of customs duty on goods that meet specified criteria, particularly when there are no substitutable goods produced in Australia. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0806256, enacted in 2008, illustrates this mechanism in practice. CSR Building Products Limited successfully applied for a TCO concerning certain coating booths, which were declared to have a free rate of duty under the relevant item of the Customs Tariff. The decision to grant the TCO was based on the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of application. The policy objective behind this concession is to support industries by reducing the cost of imported goods that are essential but not produced domestically, thereby encouraging trade and economic efficiency.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through its Part XVA, facilitates the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, which are aimed at applying a reduced rate of customs duty on specific goods. This legislative mechanism allows entities such as CSR Building Products Limited to apply for tariff concessions if the goods in question are not produced in Australia and no suitable substitutes exist. The application process necessitates the CEO to assess whether the application aligns with the core criteria set out in the Act, specifically that no substitutable goods are produced domestically. Once the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, a TCO is issued, as exemplified by TCO No. 0806256 for certain coating booths, which grants these goods a zero-rate duty as opposed to the general 5% duty. This legislative instrument applies nationally, impacting the rights of importers who can now apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the TCO's effective date. The Act ensures that the TCO does not adversely affect any existing rights or impose new liabilities on entities other than the Commonwealth.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) provides a framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which are established to allow for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. Under section 269F of the Act, a person can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods, provided the goods do not fall under the category of those specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for TCOs. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they must make a written order declaring the goods to which a specific item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies, as stated in section 269P(3). For example, in the case of TCO No 0806256, certain coating booths were declared to be subject to a TCO on 11 July 2008, following an application by CSR Building Products Limited on 1 May 2008. This TCO specifies that these booths are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, with the duty rate being reduced from 5% to free.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. According to section 269K(1), the CEO must, as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. In the instance of TCO No 0806256, no submissions were received in response to the invitation. Furthermore, subsection 269S(1) stipulates that a TCO is taken to have come into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged, meaning that TCO No 0806256 is considered to have come into force on 1 May 2008. It is important to note that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration in a manner that would disadvantage that person or impose liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. Importers, however, will benefit from the rights provided under the TCO, as they will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO is taken to have come into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches related to TCOs. However, it is implied that any failure to comply with the requirements or obligations set forth in the Act could potentially result in legal repercussions. The exact consequences for non-compliance would depend on the specific breach and could involve administrative penalties, civil actions, or criminal charges, depending on the severity and intent of the breach. It is essential for all parties involved to adhere to the provisions of the Act to avoid any potential legal ramifications.