EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0804160
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Basell Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain polypropylene natural homopolymer on 14 March 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0804160 was made on 6 June 2008. It declares that those certain polypropylene natural homopolymer are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0804160 is taken to have come into force on 14 March 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties. One of its key mechanisms is the ability to issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA, which allow for reduced customs duties on specified goods. The primary problem this legislation addresses is the potential for unfair competitive disadvantages faced by Australian businesses when imported goods are produced domestically. The policy objective is to ensure that Australian businesses can compete on a level playing field by mitigating the effects of domestic production on tariff rates. This is achieved by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to issue TCOs if certain conditions are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The process involves an application to the CEO, a review to ensure the application meets core criteria, and a decision to either approve or deny the TCO. Once a TCO is approved, it is published in the Gazette, allowing for public consultation, although no submissions were received for this particular TCO. The tariff concession does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any new liabilities.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0804160, pursuant to the Customs Act 1901, applies specifically to the concession of customs duties on certain polypropylene natural homopolymer, as requested by Basell Australia Pty Ltd. This instrument is applicable to the industry involved in the production or importation of these specific goods and is designed to provide tariff relief for goods that are not produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The geographic reach of this instrument is national, as it is issued under the Commonwealth's legislative authority. The instrument does not apply to goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which are those that cannot be subject to a tariff concession order (TCO). The application of the TCO is further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which provides the prescribed tariff schedule. The TCO comes into force on the date the application was lodged, which in this case is 14 March 2008, and it does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration in a manner that would disadvantage them or impose new liabilities.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) establishes a framework through which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). Specifically, section 269F allows an individual or entity to apply to the CEO for a TCO concerning certain goods. If the CEO determines that the application is valid and does not pertain to goods specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for a TCO, they must then evaluate whether the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. This evaluation hinges on whether, on the date of the application, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Under section 269C, an application is deemed to meet the core criteria if no substitutable goods were produced domestically. Section 269B defines terms such as 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and 'substitutable goods', clarifying that substitutable goods are those produced in Australia and capable of being used in the same manner as the goods in question. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must issue a written order in the form of a TCO, specifying the applicable item from Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) and declaring that the goods in question are subject to the prescribed duty rate (subsection 269P(3)).
The obligations imposed by the Act on the CEO include the requirement to consider TCO applications and make a decision based on whether the core criteria are met. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested party to submit objections to the TCO if they believe there are grounds for it not to be granted (subsection 269K(1)). Once a TCO is issued, it takes effect from the date the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1)). Importantly, a TCO does not affect any existing rights or impose new liabilities on individuals or entities other than the Commonwealth, except to the benefit of importers who may apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
Breaching the conditions or provisions of the Customs Act 1901 can result in significant legal consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, the Act generally provides for both civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. For instance, civil penalties might include fines, while criminal penalties could involve imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in other sections of the Act and related legislation.