EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803898
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Galaxy Import & Export Co Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain portable gas cookers on 17 March 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0803898 was made on 06 June 2008. It declares that those certain portable gas cookers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0803898 is taken to have come into force on 17 March 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803898 was enacted in 2008 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the need for tariff concessions on specific goods, allowing for lower rates of customs duty on these items. The Customs Act 1901 provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to applicants, subject to certain criteria, to lower the duty on particular goods. The problem or gap that this legislation aimed to address was the potential economic disadvantage of maintaining higher tariff rates on goods for which no locally produced substitutes exist. The instrument was introduced by the Australian Government through the relevant legislature, the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective of encouraging trade and reducing costs for businesses importing specified goods.
In response to an application from Galaxy Import & Export Co Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain portable gas cookers, the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus satisfying the core criteria under section 269C of the Customs Act 1901. Consequently, TCO No. 0803898 was issued, applying a zero rate of duty on these goods, which otherwise carry a general duty rate of 5%. This legislative measure is designed to benefit importers by potentially allowing them to claim refunds for duties paid on these goods since the TCO's effective date of 17 March 2008. Importantly, the enactment of this TCO does not impose any new liabilities and preserves the rights of all parties as they stood before the TCO's registration.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803898, pursuant to the Customs Act 1901, applies to the concession of customs duty on certain portable gas cookers. This Act allows for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) that reduce the duty on specific goods if certain criteria are met. The application of this Act is primarily directed towards businesses and individuals who import the specified goods, as it provides them with a lower rate of customs duty. The geographic scope of this legislation is national, as it applies under Commonwealth law, thus affecting all states and territories within Australia. However, the Act excludes certain goods from being subject to a TCO, specifically those listed in section 269SJ of the Customs Act 1901. The application process requires that no substitutable goods be produced in Australia at the time of the application, as outlined in section 269C. The TCO in question, effective from 17 March 2008, was made on 6 June 2008, and it declares that the specified portable gas cookers are to be treated as if they fall under item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby granting them a duty-free status. The application process includes a public consultation period, though in this case, no submissions were received.
Key Provisions
The main sections of the Customs Act 1901 that govern the making of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) include section 269F (269F), which allows for applications to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO, and section 269C (269C), which sets out the core criteria that an application must meet. Specifically, section 269C (269C) mandates that the application meets the core criteria if, on the day it was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The CEO must also determine whether the application pertains to goods not specified in section 269SJ (269SJ) of the Act, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO.
Under the Act, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, inviting any person who believes the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission (section 269K(1) (269K(1))). The CEO must then decide whether to make a written order (the TCO) declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (section 269P(3) (269P(3))). If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, the TCO comes into force on the day the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1) (269S(1))).
The obligations imposed on parties under this legislation include the requirement for applicants to ensure their TCO applications meet the core criteria as specified in section 269C (269C). The CEO must then review the application to confirm that it pertains to goods that do not fall under the exclusions listed in section 269SJ (269SJ) of the Act. Furthermore, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette and consider any submissions received before making a decision on the TCO application.
The Act provides for certain civil and criminal consequences for breaches. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences or penalties related to the TCO process, general provisions in the Customs Act 1901 may apply to breaches involving the TCO process. These could include fines or imprisonment for knowingly or recklessly providing false or misleading information in an application. Additionally, any party failing to comply with the conditions of a TCO may face penalties under the relevant sections of the Customs Act 1901, which could include financial penalties or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.