EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803421
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Toshiba International Corporation Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain hydro turbine main inlet valve on 03 March 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0803421 was made on 09 May 2008. It declares that those certain hydro turbine main inlet valves are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0803421 is taken to have come into force on 03 March 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for administering customs and excise duties, including the scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The Act aims to facilitate trade by reducing the customs duty on certain goods, provided they meet specific criteria, thereby encouraging the importation of goods that are not produced domestically. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803421, made on 09 May 2008 under the authority of the Customs Act 1901, was introduced in response to an application by Toshiba International Corporation Pty Ltd for a TCO on certain hydro turbine main inlet valves. The instrument declares that these specific valves are subject to a zero percent duty rate, as no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, aligning with the core criteria outlined in section 269C of the Act. The policy objective of this concession is to reduce the financial burden on importers and potentially stimulate investment and innovation in industries where local production is not viable.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as outlined in Part XVA, establishes a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), which provides for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. This legislation applies to any person or entity that seeks to import goods that can benefit from tariff concessions, ensuring that such imports are not subject to the otherwise applicable higher rates of duty. The scope of the Act includes all goods for which a TCO can be applied, provided they meet the core criteria set out in the Act, specifically that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. The Act extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, impacting importers and exporters nationwide. The application of TCOs is contingent upon the CEO’s determination that no substitutable goods are being produced domestically, and that the application complies with the stipulated criteria. The Act also provides mechanisms for public consultation before a TCO is finalised, although in the case of TCO No. 0803421, no submissions were received. This specific TCO, concerning certain hydro turbine main inlet valves, came into effect from the date of the application, 03 March 2008, and benefits importers by setting the duty rate at free, whereas the general duty rate is 5%.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803421 under the Customs Act 1901, specifically sections 269C, 269B, and 269P, outline the conditions and processes for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Section 269C sets out the core criteria for a TCO, requiring that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia on the day the application is lodged. Section 269B defines key terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods," ensuring clarity in the application process. Once the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that an application meets these criteria, they must make a written order under section 269P(3), declaring the goods eligible for a lower rate of customs duty.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Applicants for a TCO, such as Toshiba International Corporation Pty Ltd in this case, must ensure that their applications meet the specified criteria and provide all necessary documentation. The CEO must review the application and determine if it meets the core criteria as outlined in section 269C. If satisfied, the CEO is required to make a TCO, as mandated by section 269P(3). Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties, as per subsection 269K(1), although no submissions were received for this particular TCO.
In terms of offences and penalties, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches related to TCOs. However, general provisions within the Act and related legislation may apply. For example, any misleading or deceptive conduct in the application process could potentially lead to penalties under consumer protection laws, although such cases would be governed by specific statutes rather than the Customs Act. The focus of the Act is primarily on the procedural correctness of the TCO application and the subsequent tariff concessions, rather than on punitive measures for breaches.
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803421 does not impose any liabilities on individuals or entities other than the Commonwealth. It ensures that the rights of importers are beneficially affected, allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into effect on 03 March 2008. The Act also safeguards that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration, thereby preventing any disadvantage or imposition of liabilities for actions taken before the TCO's registration. This legal framework ensures that the benefits of the tariff concession are clearly defined and limited to the intended scope, maintaining fairness and transparency in the customs duty process.