EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803038
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Sperling Enterprises Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain car seat covers on 22 February 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0803038 was made on 09 May 2008. It declares that those certain car seat covers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 7.5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0803038 is taken to have come into force on 22 February 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made to offer reduced customs duties on certain goods. This Act was introduced to address the need for a streamlined process to provide tariff concessions for specific goods, ensuring that Australian industries can remain competitive and that consumers benefit from lower prices on certain imported items. The instrument in question, Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803038, was made on 9 May 2008, and it grants a tariff concession on particular car seat covers by reducing the duty rate from 7.5% to free. This measure was implemented following an application by Sperling Enterprises Pty Ltd, and no submissions opposing the concession were received. The concession is effective from 22 February 2008, the date the application was lodged, and it provides benefits to importers who can apply for a refund of duties paid on these goods since the effective date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0803038 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to the specific goods identified in the instrument, namely certain car seat covers, and to the application process for tariff concessions by entities such as Sperling Enterprises Pty Ltd. The Act facilitates a reduction in customs duty for these goods if the Chief Executive Officer of Customs determines that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The instrument's application is geographically confined to Australia, and its jurisdictional reach extends under the Commonwealth. The process for establishing a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) includes a public consultation period as mandated by the Act, although in this case, no submissions were received. The TCO does not apply retroactively, thus not affecting any rights or imposing liabilities on entities for actions taken before the instrument's effective date. Importers of the specified goods may benefit from the concession by applying for a refund of duties paid on imports since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, establishes a scheme allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) (sections 269F and 269P). These orders apply a lower rate of customs duty to specific goods, which are outlined in item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The application process for a TCO begins when a person applies to the CEO for a concession in respect of goods (section 269F). If the CEO determines that the goods are not prohibited under section 269SJ, the application must meet core criteria (section 269C). These criteria require that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The definitions of 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively. Once the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must make a written order declaring that the goods are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Tariff (subsection 269P(3)).
The obligations imposed by the Act on the CEO include ensuring that any TCO application is valid and meets the core criteria before making an order. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). This notice must be published as soon as practicable after the CEO accepts the application as valid. In the case of TCO No. 0803038, no submissions were received in response to the published notice. The TCO comes into force on the day the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1)). The TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth, ensuring that it does not disadvantage or impose liabilities on anyone for actions taken before the date of registration. Importers will benefit from this TCO as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
In terms of consequences for breach, the Act does not explicitly state any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for failing to comply with the requirements of a TCO or the process outlined in the Act. However, any failure to comply with the customs duty regulations or fraud in relation to the importation or exportation of goods could result in penalties under other sections of the Customs Act 1901. The specific penalties for such breaches would depend on the nature and severity of the breach but could include fines and imprisonment.