EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0800347
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Olex Australia Pty Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain metal sheathing line on 07 January 2008.
Instrument
TCO No 0800347 was made on 28 March 2008. It declares that those certain metal sheathing lines are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0800347 is taken to have come into force on 07 January 2008.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, addresses the need for a regulatory framework governing the imposition and concession of customs duties on imported goods. Specifically, Part XVA of the Act establishes the process for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which are instruments that allow for reduced customs duty rates on certain imported goods. This legislative framework was introduced to facilitate economic efficiency by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concessions where appropriate, thereby encouraging trade and import of specific goods that are not domestically produced. The policy objective behind this concession scheme is to support industries by making imported goods more competitively priced against locally produced alternatives, provided no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0800347, enacted in 2008, details the application of this scheme to certain metal sheathing lines, illustrating the process and criteria involved in granting such concessions.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as outlined in the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0800347, establishes a framework under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders apply to specific goods, such as certain metal sheathing lines, for which an application has been made and approved by the CEO. The act primarily applies to entities or individuals who import or are interested in importing the specified goods, ensuring that they benefit from a reduced rate of customs duty. This legislation operates on a national level across Australia, impacting the customs and import duties regime. Notably, the Act excludes certain goods as specified in section 269SJ, which cannot be subject to a TCO. The instrument does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose new liabilities; instead, it provides for potential refunds of duty to importers under certain conditions.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0800347, under the Customs Act 1901, involve the establishment and application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Section 269F allows an individual or entity to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO concerning specific goods, provided these goods are not listed in section 269SJ, which details those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO (Section 269F). If the application meets the core criteria as outlined in section 269C, the CEO must then make a written order, as specified in section 269P(3), declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thus granting them a lower rate of customs duty. In this case, the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thereby allowing the TCO to be issued (Section 269C, 269P(3)).
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties or entities it governs are primarily administrative and procedural. The CEO has the responsibility to ensure that applications for TCOs are valid and meet the core criteria (Section 269F, 269C). The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made (Subsection 269K(1)). Additionally, the CEO is required to make a written order if the application meets the core criteria, specifying the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 that applies to the goods (Section 269P(3)). Importers, on the other hand, benefit from the right to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is deemed to have come into force (Paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
The Act stipulates specific consequences for breaches related to TCOs. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences, it is clear that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth or impose liabilities on any person (Subsection 269S(1)). Importers, however, are granted the right to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is taken to have come into force, which provides a clear benefit to them. The statutory framework thus ensures that the TCO mechanism operates within defined legal parameters, protecting both the rights of the Commonwealth and the interests of importers.