EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721923
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Melbatex Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain aramid staple fibres 2 ply yarn on 20 December 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0721923 was made on 14 March 2008. It declares that those certain aramid staple fibres 2 ply yarns are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0721923 is taken to have come into force on 20 December 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721923, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to address the issue of providing tariff concessions for specific imported goods. This legislative instrument was enacted to enable the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to apply a reduced rate of customs duty on goods specified in a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). The Act allows for the application of a lower rate of customs duty on goods if certain conditions are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The objective of this legislation is to provide relief to importers by reducing the customs duty on specific goods, thereby potentially lowering the overall cost of imported goods and promoting fair trade practices. This instrument was developed following an application by Melbatex Pty Ltd for a TCO concerning certain aramid staple fibres 2 ply yarn, which was subsequently granted by the CEO of Customs.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, provides the framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which are administered by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders apply to goods specified by an applicant and grant lower rates of customs duty if certain criteria are met, including the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of application. The legislation permits applications from any person who is not seeking concessions for goods listed in section 269SJ, which excludes certain specified goods from eligibility for tariff concessions. The scope of the Act is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth, and the application of any TCO is contingent on meeting the criteria outlined in sections 269C, 269B, and 269D of the Act. The Act also includes provisions for consultation and public notice, ensuring transparency and the opportunity for submissions before a TCO is issued. Notably, the Act does not retroactively affect any rights or impose liabilities on individuals or entities other than the Commonwealth.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) outlines a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) (s 269F). An application for a TCO can be made by any person, and if the CEO is satisfied that the application pertains to goods that do not fall under the prohibited categories listed in section 269SJ, the application must be assessed against the core criteria (s 269C). A TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the date the application was submitted, no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (s 269C, s 269D, s 269E). In this context, 'substitutable goods' refers to goods produced in Australia that serve a similar function or purpose to the goods for which the TCO is being sought (s 269B).
Upon confirming that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO is mandated to issue a written order (a TCO) that specifies the particular item in Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) that applies to the goods in question (s 269P(3)). For instance, Tariff Concession Order No. 0721923, issued on 14 March 2008, declares that certain aramid staple fibres 2 ply yarns are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, resulting in a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5% (s 269P(3)). This TCO was effective from the date of the application, 20 December 2007, as per subsection 269S(1) of the Act.
Entities and individuals affected by the TCO are subject to certain obligations and requirements under the Act. For instance, when an application for a TCO is accepted as valid, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to submit their views on why the TCO should not be granted (s 269K(1)). In this case, no submissions were received in response to the notice. Additionally, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as they stood on the date of the TCO registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person for actions taken or omitted prior to the registration date (s 269S(1)).
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or the TCOs issued under it may lead to various consequences. Although the explanatory statement does not specify the exact offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, it is known that non-compliance with the Customs Act 1901 can lead to both civil and criminal penalties. Civil penalties may include fines and the recovery of unpaid duty, while criminal penalties can include imprisonment and/or fines, depending on the severity of the offence and the discretion of the court. The maximum penalties are not specified in the explanatory statement but would be determined by the relevant sections of the Act and any other applicable legislation.