EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721703
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Swan Imports Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain solid state decoupler on 17 December 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0721703 was made on 07 March 2008. It declares that those certain solid state decoupler are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0721703 is taken to have come into force on 17 December 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721703, enacted in 2008, is an instrument under the Customs Act 1901 designed to provide tariff concessions for specific goods, thereby addressing the need for a streamlined process to reduce customs duties on certain imported items. This legislative measure was introduced to facilitate smoother trade practices by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant lower customs duty rates on goods not produced in Australia, thus fostering economic efficiency and competitiveness. The instrument was enacted by the Parliament of Australia with the objective of enhancing the trade environment by providing tariff relief where appropriate. The process involves an application to the CEO, who must determine whether the goods in question meet the core criteria, including the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. Once these criteria are met, the CEO issues a written order, known as a Tariff Concession Order, which specifies the reduced duty rate applicable to the goods in question.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721703 is part of the Customs Act 1901, which enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concessions on certain goods. This instrument applies to entities and individuals seeking to import specific goods into Australia, namely certain solid state decouplers, which benefit from a tariff concession that reduces the customs duty from 5% to free. The scope of the Act covers those who apply for and receive a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) as stipulated in section 269F of the Act, provided that the goods in question do not fall under the exclusions outlined in section 269SJ. The Act applies to the entire Commonwealth of Australia, impacting all states and territories uniformly. The application of the TCO is backdated to the date of the application, in this case, 17 December 2007, under subsection 269S(1) of the Act. The TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person. Instead, it offers potential benefits to importers who may apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721703 under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) include sections 269C, 269P, and 269S. Section 269C outlines the core criteria that must be met for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) to be issued. Specifically, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) must be satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged (section 269C). Section 269P(3) mandates that if the CEO is satisfied the application meets these core criteria, they must make a written order (a TCO) specifying the lower rate of customs duty applicable to the goods (section 269P(3)). Section 269S(1) determines that a TCO is considered to have come into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Firstly, the CEO must ensure that the application for a TCO is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which lists those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. Secondly, the CEO must determine whether the application meets the core criteria as outlined in section 269C. If these criteria are met, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to lodge submissions against the proposed TCO within a specified timeframe (subsection 269K(1)). Furthermore, the CEO must consider any submissions received and decide whether to issue the TCO.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Act does not explicitly state any specific penalties for failing to comply with the requirements of a TCO. However, the Act does provide for general penalties under other sections for breaches of the Customs Act 1901. For example, under section 234 of the Act, a person who commits an offence against the Act can be subject to a civil penalty of up to $22,200 for a corporation and $4,440 for an individual, or a criminal penalty of up to two years imprisonment, or both. These penalties are applicable to breaches of the Customs Act 1901 in general and may apply to any failure to comply with the provisions related to TCOs.
Additionally, the Act ensures that the rights of any person (other than the Commonwealth) are not adversely affected by the issuance of a TCO. Specifically, the rights of importers are beneficially affected, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO is taken to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The TCO itself does not impose any liabilities on any person. This ensures that the concessions granted by the TCO do not unfairly disadvantage any party or impose new obligations on them.