Tariff Concession Order 0721033

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2008L01003 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721033

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Fiskars Brands Pty Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain solar portable charges on 12 December 2007.

Instrument

TCO No 0721033 was made on 29 February 2008.  It declares that those certain solar portable charges are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0721033 is taken to have come into force on 12 December 2007.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, serves to regulate the import and export of goods, including the imposition and remission of customs duties. One of the mechanisms provided by the Act for modifying customs duty rates is through the issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721033, introduced in 2008, addresses the need for tariff concessions for specific goods not produced domestically, thereby facilitating access to affordable imported goods for Australian consumers and businesses. This instrument was created following an application from Fiskars Brands Pty Limited for a TCO concerning certain solar portable chargers, which were deemed to have no substitutable Australian-made alternatives, thus meeting the core criteria under the Act. The policy objective of this concession is to lower the rate of customs duty on these imported goods, enhancing their affordability and accessibility in the Australian market.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, provides a mechanism for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods. This legislative instrument applies to any person who applies for a TCO in respect of goods not listed in section 269SJ of the Act, which excludes specific types of goods from eligibility. The application process requires that, at the time of application, there are no substitutable goods produced in Australia, as defined by sections 269D and 269E. Once the CEO determines that an application meets these core criteria, a TCO is issued, effectively lowering the duty rate for the specified goods. The geographic reach of this Act is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia. The TCO does not retroactively affect the rights of any person except the Commonwealth and does not impose any new liabilities on individuals or entities, although it does allow for potential duty refunds for importers of the specified goods.

Key Provisions

The key provisions of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721033, made under the Customs Act 1901, are primarily concerned with the establishment of a tariff concession order (TCO) for certain solar portable charges. According to section 269F of the Act, an application can be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods, provided that certain criteria are met. Section 269C specifies that a TCO application meets the core criteria if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged, as defined under sections 269D and 269E of the Act. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, a written order (TCO) is made under section 269P(3), declaring that the specified goods are subject to a prescribed tariff item. For Fiskars Brands Pty Limited’s solar portable charges, TCO No. 0721033 was issued on 29 February 2008, applying item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which sets the duty rate at free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Firstly, applicants for a TCO must ensure that their application complies with the core criteria set out in the Act, specifically that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the application date. The CEO must then verify these criteria and, if satisfied, make the TCO as stipulated. Furthermore, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette under subsection 269K(1), inviting any person who may oppose the TCO to lodge a submission. In this case, no submissions were received, which likely expedited the process. Additionally, section 269S(1) dictates that the TCO is considered to come into force on the day the application was lodged, which for this instrument is 12 December 2007. In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly state maximum penalties for failing to comply with the provisions of a TCO. However, the Act generally provides for penalties under various sections for offences related to customs duties and other import/export regulations. These penalties can include fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. For instance, section 223A of the Act pertains to offences involving the making of false statements or the use of false documents in relation to customs matters, which could be relevant if there were any fraudulent activities in applying for or administering a TCO. Furthermore, any failure to comply with the terms of a TCO could potentially lead to civil actions for damages or administrative penalties as outlined in other relevant legislation, such as the Crimes Act 1914. The specific consequences will depend on the nature and severity of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.