EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721025
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
CSR Building Products Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain rotary bin and or silo discharge on 11 December 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0721025 was made on 29 February 2008. It declares that those certain rotary bin and or silo discharges are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0721025 is taken to have come into force on 11 December 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties. Part XVA of the Act specifically introduces a scheme where Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This was introduced to address the need for reducing customs duty on certain goods that are not produced domestically, thus encouraging their importation and use. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721025, made under this Act, details a specific case where CSR Building Products Limited applied for a TCO on certain rotary bin and silo discharges on 11 December 2007. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus satisfying the core criteria for the concession. Consequently, the instrument was made on 29 February 2008, applying a zero rate of duty to these goods, which otherwise would have been subject to a general duty rate of 5%. The instrument does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on anyone except the Commonwealth, and it beneficially affects the rights of importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the concession.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, provides a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can designate certain goods to be exempt from certain customs duties. These orders apply to any goods specified in the order, and in the case of TCO No. 0721025, these are certain rotary bin and silo discharges, for which the rate of duty is reduced from 5% to free. The Act applies to any person or entity that imports the specified goods and seeks to benefit from the lower duty rate. The application of the Act is national in scope, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act excludes certain goods from being subject to TCOs as specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which includes goods that are considered to be substitutable to those produced in Australia. The Act also extends its application through subordinate instruments such as regulations, which can provide further clarification on the implementation and enforcement of the TCOs.
Key Provisions
The main sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0721025, made under the Customs Act 1901, include section 269F, which allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). If the CEO determines that the application is valid and meets the core criteria, they must make a TCO, as outlined in section 269C, which stipulates that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged (subsection 269P(3)). The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties, as per subsection 269K(1). The TCO itself, which in this case pertains to certain rotary bin and silo discharges, specifies that these goods are subject to a free rate of duty, as opposed to the general rate of 5%, as per item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This TCO came into force on 11 December 2007, the date the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1)).
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act on the parties and entities it governs include the obligation for the CEO to carefully assess any TCO application to ensure it meets the core criteria, particularly regarding the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. Once a TCO is made, the CEO must also ensure that an appropriate notice is published in the Gazette to invite submissions from any interested parties, allowing them to voice any objections or concerns they might have. This process is designed to ensure that the TCO is made fairly and transparently, taking into account any relevant information from interested parties. The TCO also ensures that the rights of importers are beneficially affected, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force.
Any breach of the provisions of this Act may result in various civil or criminal consequences, although the Act itself does not specify the exact nature of these consequences. The maximum penalties for breaches of the Customs Act 1901 can vary significantly depending on the nature and severity of the offence. Generally, penalties can range from fines to imprisonment, with the exact penalties determined by the court based on the circumstances of the case. It is important to note, however, that the Act does not impose any liabilities on any person, other than the Commonwealth, in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration of the TCO. Therefore, the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, will not be adversely affected by the TCO.