Tariff Concession Order 0720598

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2008L00636 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0720598

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Nufarm Australia Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain chlorthal dimethyl on 03 December 2007.

Instrument

TCO No 0720598 was made on 19 February 2008.  It declares that those certain chlorthal dimethyl are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0720598 is taken to have come into force on 03 December 2007.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0720598, enacted in 2008, was introduced to address the need for tariff concessions under the Customs Act 1901. This instrument was designed to facilitate tariff reductions on specific goods, in this case, certain chlorthal dimethyl, by applying a zero rate of customs duty instead of the general 5% rate. The Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) are made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) when certain core criteria are met, primarily ensuring that the goods in question are not produced in Australia and there are no substitutable goods. This legislation aims to provide economic benefits to importers by reducing the cost of importing these goods, thereby potentially increasing their availability and affordability in the Australian market. The instrument was developed following an application by Nufarm Australia Limited and, after satisfying the core criteria, the CEO issued the TCO on 19 February 2008. The process involved publishing a notice in the Gazette to invite any interested parties to submit objections, though none were received. As per the Customs Act, the TCO was taken to have come into force on the date the application was lodged, 3 December 2007. Importantly, the TCO does not affect any existing rights of individuals or impose new liabilities, ensuring a smooth transition and continued protection of stakeholders' rights.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901 applies to individuals and entities seeking tariff concessions for specific goods entering Australia, with the process overseen by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The act facilitates the reduction or waiver of customs duties on goods not produced domestically, provided the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C, which includes the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to imports into Australia. The instrument in question, TCO No. 0720598, applies specifically to certain chlorthal dimethyl products, reducing their duty rate from 5% to free. It does not affect any pre-existing rights of non-Commonwealth entities nor does it impose any liabilities on them. The instrument came into effect on the date of application, 3 December 2007, and allows for duty refunds for importers of these goods since that date.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which can reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods. An application for a TCO can be made by any person to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs (s 269F). If the application does not pertain to goods specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for a TCO, the CEO assesses whether it meets the core criteria as outlined in section 269C. A TCO application meets these criteria if, on the date of application, no goods that could substitute for the ones in question were being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (s 269C, 269D, 269E). If satisfied, the CEO must issue a TCO, as stipulated in section 269P(3), declaring that the goods in question are subject to a specified lower rate of duty listed in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. Under this Act, the CEO has the obligation to consider TCO applications and, if the core criteria are met, to make a written order to reduce the customs duty on the specified goods. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting the application as valid, inviting submissions from any person who may have reasons why the TCO should not be made (s 269K(1)). In the case of TCO No. 0720598, no submissions were received in response to this invitation. Furthermore, the Act mandates that a TCO is considered to have come into effect on the date the application was lodged (s 269S(1)). Consequently, TCO No. 0720598 is deemed to have come into force on 3 December 2007. The TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as they stood on the date of registration, ensuring no person (other than the Commonwealth) is disadvantaged or imposed liabilities for actions taken before the TCO's registration date (s 269V). Importers, however, will benefit as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (Reg 126(1)(r)). The TCO does not impose any new liabilities on any person. For breaches related to the incorrect application or fraudulent claims under the TCO, the Customs Act 1901 imposes various offences and penalties. The specific consequences for breaches depend on the nature and severity of the offence but can include substantial fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The maximum penalties for these offences are detailed in the relevant sections of the Customs Act and associated regulations, providing a framework for enforcement and compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.