Tariff Concession Order 0720068

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2008L00683 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0720068

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

XTEK Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain riot shields on 23 November 2007.

Instrument

TCO No 0720068 was made on 12 February 2008.  It declares that those certain riot shields are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0720068 is taken to have come into force on 23 November 2007.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties, including the establishment of a scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The problem or gap this legislation addresses is the need to provide tariff concessions for specific goods under certain conditions, thereby potentially reducing the financial burden on importers and enhancing trade competitiveness. Instrument No. 0720068, made under the Customs Act, aims to grant a tariff concession to XTEK Limited for certain riot shields, effective from 23 November 2007. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia for these riot shields, thus meeting the core criteria for a TCO. The policy objective is to allow for a lower rate of customs duty on these goods, thereby benefiting importers and potentially stimulating trade in these specific items.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can implement to apply a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods. This legislation applies to any person or entity seeking to import goods that are eligible for tariff concessions, provided the goods are not listed in section 269SJ, which excludes certain items from TCOs. The Act’s application is national, extending across Australia as per the Commonwealth’s legislative authority. A TCO application is subject to meeting the core criteria, notably that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. The TCO No. 0720068, for instance, granted a zero percent duty rate to certain riot shields, effective from the date of the application, 23 November 2007. The CEO is mandated to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting objections to the TCO, although in this case, no objections were received. The commencement of the TCO aligns with the date of the application, and it does not retroactively affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth, nor does it impose liabilities for actions prior to its registration. Importers can benefit from this TCO by applying for duty refunds for goods imported since its effective date.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0720068 (the Instrument) include section 269C, which defines the core criteria for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). Specifically, section 269C stipulates that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B clarifies the definitions of 'goods produced in Australia,' 'ordinary course of business,' and 'substitutable goods' relevant to the TCO application. Section 269P(3) mandates that if the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, they must make a written order declaring that the goods subject to the TCO application are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This declaration effectively applies a zero rate of duty to the specified goods, in this case, certain riot shields. The Instrument imposes obligations on several parties, including applicants for TCOs, the CEO, and potentially other entities such as importers. The applicant, in this case, XTEK Limited, must ensure their application for a TCO meets the criteria set out in the Act, particularly that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The CEO is obliged to review the application, determine whether it meets the core criteria, and, if satisfied, issue a written TCO. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to lodge submissions against the TCO, although in this instance, no submissions were received. Importers of the goods, as beneficiaries of the TCO, have the right to apply for a refund of duty paid on goods imported since the TCO is taken to have come into force. There are no explicit offences or penalties stated within the Instrument itself for breach of the Act's provisions. However, the general legal framework of the Customs Act 1901 may impose penalties for non-compliance with its requirements. These could include fines and imprisonment for wilful or negligent breaches. For instance, under the general provisions of the Customs Act, unauthorised importation of goods or failure to comply with tariff regulations can attract significant penalties. While the specific maximum penalties for breaches of the TCO provisions are not detailed in the Instrument, they are likely to be aligned with the penalties applicable to broader Customs Act violations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.