EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0718674
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Anasazi Trading Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain household articles on 01 November 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0718674 was made on 18 January 2008. It declares that those certain household articles are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0718674 is taken to have come into force on 01 November 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the imposition of customs duties on goods imported into Australia. The Act includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for reduced rates of customs duty on certain goods. The problem this legislation addresses is the potential economic disadvantage faced by Australian consumers and businesses when goods are produced overseas at lower costs and imported into Australia, where they are subject to full customs duty rates. The policy objective is to encourage the production of certain goods within Australia by providing tariff relief on imported goods that do not have a substitutable domestic equivalent. This is achieved by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make TCOs, thereby reducing the customs duty rate on specified goods to zero if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This approach aims to support Australian industries and promote fair competition between domestically produced and imported goods.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0718674 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to specific goods for which a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) has been requested and subsequently granted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Act allows for the reduction or elimination of customs duty on certain goods if it is determined that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, thereby encouraging importation and use of these goods. The scope of the Act is limited to the specific goods outlined in the application and declared under the Instrument, which in this instance pertains to certain household articles. The TCO applies from the date the application was lodged, retroactively benefiting importers who may qualify for a refund of duty paid on those goods prior to the TCO coming into effect.
The Instrument extends its application to the Commonwealth and any entities or individuals involved in the importation of the specified goods. The legislation does not apply to goods that are explicitly excluded under section 269SJ of the Act, which includes certain types of goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The geographical reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to customs duties applicable across Australia. The Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which can further specify the types of goods eligible for TCOs or impose additional criteria. The rights of parties other than the Commonwealth are preserved, ensuring that no pre-existing rights or liabilities are adversely affected by the TCO.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0718674 under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) include sections 269C, 269B, 269D, 269E, 269F, 269P, and 269S. Section 269F allows an individual or entity to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) in respect of certain goods. Section 269C stipulates that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Sections 269B and 269D define the terms 'goods produced in Australia' and 'ordinary course of business', respectively, while section 269E defines 'substitutable goods'. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, section 269P(3) mandates that a written order (a TCO) must be made, declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Firstly, section 269K(1) requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made. The CEO must consider these submissions before deciding whether to issue a TCO. If no submissions are received, the CEO proceeds to assess the application against the core criteria. Additionally, section 269S(1) specifies that a TCO is deemed to come into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged. The Act also ensures that the TCO does not adversely affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth as at the date of registration, and it does not impose any liabilities on any person for actions taken before the TCO was registered.
Under the Customs Act 1901, breaches of the provisions concerning Tariff Concession Orders may lead to various penalties and consequences. For instance, if an entity falsely claims that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia when applying for a TCO, this could be considered a civil or criminal offence, depending on the circumstances. The Act does not specify particular penalties for such breaches but generally, any misrepresentation or fraudulent activity related to customs duties can attract significant penalties under the Customs Act and related regulations. For instance, knowingly making a false statement in connection with a customs matter can result in criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. In the case of civil penalties, the amount can vary depending on the severity and intent of the breach, but it can be substantial enough to deter non-compliance.
Moreover, section 269K(1) of the Act stipulates that if a person submits a submission in response to the notice published by the CEO, and if it is found that the submission contains false or misleading information, this could lead to further legal consequences. The CEO is mandated to consider all valid submissions, and providing false information can undermine the integrity of the process, potentially leading to enforcement actions against the individual or entity responsible. Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for the review and appeal of TCO decisions, ensuring that any party aggrieved by a decision can seek redress through the appropriate legal channels. These provisions are designed to maintain the fairness and effectiveness of the tariff concession scheme.