EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0718657
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Persal & Co. Construction Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain truck mountable aerial work platforms on 31 October 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0718657 was made on 17 January 2008. It declares that those certain truck mountable aerial work platforms are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0718657 is taken to have come into force on 31 October 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Australian Parliament and provides the legal framework for the administration of customs and excise in Australia. One of the mechanisms established under this Act is the ability to create Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allow for the reduction of customs duty on certain goods under specific circumstances. This process was introduced to address the need for flexible tariff arrangements that could respond to economic and market changes, particularly where there are no locally produced substitutes for imported goods. In this context, Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0718657 was introduced on 17 January 2008, in response to an application from Persal & Co. Construction Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain truck mountable aerial work platforms. The policy objective of this instrument is to ensure that the importation of these goods is facilitated by a zero rate of duty, thereby benefiting importers who can now apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the effective date of the concession, which is 31 October 2007.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0718657, under Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901, applies to any person who applies for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) in respect of goods, provided the goods do not fall under the categories specified in section 269SJ of the Act that are ineligible for such concessions. The application process is overseen by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), who must ensure that the application meets the core criteria outlined in sections 269C, 269D, 269E, and 269F. If the application is deemed to meet these criteria, the CEO issues a written order that specifies the goods eligible for the concession. In this instance, certain truck mountable aerial work platforms, which otherwise attract a 5% customs duty, are subject to a free rate of duty due to the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This legislative instrument has a national reach, applying throughout Australia and is effective from the date the application was lodged, 31 October 2007, without retroactive application to pre-existing transactions. Any person seeking to challenge the making of a TCO has the opportunity to lodge a submission with the CEO, though in this case, no such submissions were received.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) as it relates to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be found in Part XVA. Specifically, section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods. The CEO must then decide if the application meets the core criteria, which are outlined in section 269C of the Act. For the application to meet these criteria, it must be the case that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Definitions for terms such as 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B of the Act, respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the criteria, a written order (a TCO) must be made under section 269P(3) of the Act, declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties involved in the TCO process. Firstly, the CEO must ensure that any TCO application received is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which details those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. Once an application is deemed valid, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette (subsection 269K(1)) inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made. The CEO must also consider any submissions received and make a decision based on whether the application meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C of the Act. Once a TCO is made, the CEO must ensure that it is registered and that the rights of importers are protected, allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force.
The Act provides for various consequences and penalties for breaches related to the TCO process. While the specific consequences for non-compliance with the TCO requirements are not detailed in the provided text, it is clear that the Act intends to protect the rights of importers and ensure that any TCO made does not disadvantage or impose liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth. The Act also specifies that a TCO does not affect the rights of a person as at the date of registration, so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The primary focus appears to be on ensuring the process is fair and transparent, with an emphasis on the rights and benefits of importers.