Tariff Concession Order 0717248

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2008L00303 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0717248

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Pilkington Australia Engineering Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain chemical vapour glass coater on 10 October 2007.

Instrument

TCO No 0717248 was made on 29 January 2008.  It declares that those certain chemical vapour glass coaters are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0717248 is taken to have come into force on 10 October 2007.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0717248, enacted in 2008, addresses the need for tariff concessions on specific goods under the Customs Act 1901. The instrument was introduced to provide relief by lowering the customs duty rate for certain goods, specifically chemical vapour glass coaters in this instance, by allowing them to be subject to a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). This was achieved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs determining that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus meeting the core criteria as outlined in section 269C of the Act. The primary objective of this legislation, as stated, is to benefit the rights of importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on the specified goods, without imposing any new liabilities on any person. The instrument was created following an application by Pilkington Australia Engineering Pty Ltd, and no submissions were received in opposition to the TCO, indicating broad acceptance of the tariff concession. The TCO, effective from the date of the application on 10 October 2007, ensures that it does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities for actions taken prior to its enactment.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0717248 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to entities or individuals seeking tariff concessions for specific goods, namely certain chemical vapour glass coaters, which are granted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislative instrument specifically targets the reduction of customs duty on these goods, provided they meet the criteria outlined in the Act, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia and its customs regulations. Exclusions from this Act include goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which are ineligible for tariff concessions. The application of this legislation can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, though in this case, no such instruments are specified. The commencement date of this particular TCO is effectively retroactive to the date of the application, 10 October 2007, ensuring that importers can benefit from the tariff concession from that date forward.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901 (section 269F) allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) for certain goods, provided the application does not involve goods specified in section 269SJ. A TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day of application, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (section 269C). In this context, 'substitutable goods' refers to goods produced in Australia that could serve the same purpose or function as the goods for which the TCO is sought (section 269D and 269E). If the CEO determines that the application meets these criteria, they must issue a written order (section 269P(3)) specifying that the goods are subject to a particular tariff item in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on parties include the requirement for the CEO to consider the core criteria when deciding on a TCO application. This involves verifying that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of application. Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties if they consider the TCO should not be made (section 269K(1)). In this case, no submissions were received. For the TCO to come into effect, it must be issued on the day the application is lodged (subsection 269S(1)). Importantly, the TCO does not retroactively affect the rights of any person, except the Commonwealth, meaning that no one can be disadvantaged or imposed liabilities for actions taken before the TCO was registered (subsection 269S(1)). Importers, however, will benefit as they can apply for a refund of duties paid on goods imported since the TCO's effective date under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. Breaching the conditions of a TCO or failing to comply with the Act's provisions could lead to various consequences. While the explanatory statement does not specify exact penalties for breach, the Customs Act 1901 generally outlines penalties for non-compliance with customs regulations. These could include fines and potential imprisonment for serious offences. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they are designed to ensure compliance with customs laws and regulations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.