EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0717045
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Kidde Australia applied for a TCO in respect of certain fire fighting hoses on 9 October 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0717045 was made on 21 December 2007. It declares that those certain fire fighting hoses are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0717045 is taken to have come into force on 9 October 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0717045 was enacted in 2007 under the Customs Act 1901, which provides the framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). The primary problem or gap that this legislation was introduced to address is the application of a lower rate of customs duty on goods that do not have substitutable equivalents produced within Australia. This was to encourage the importation of goods that could not be readily replaced by Australian-made products, thus potentially reducing costs for importers and end-users. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, in accordance with section 269F of the Act, after Kidde Australia applied for a TCO for certain fire fighting hoses. The policy objective, as stated, is to provide tariff concessions that benefit importers by allowing them to apply for refunds on duties paid on these goods since the effective date of the TCO, as outlined in the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to individuals and entities seeking tariff concessions for specific goods, particularly those not produced in Australia and not listed in section 269SJ. This Act is a Commonwealth statute and its provisions extend nationally. The scope of the Act is specifically directed at the application and assessment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which are processed by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The Act provides a mechanism for reducing customs duty on certain imported goods under certain conditions, primarily where there is no Australian-made equivalent. The instrument in question, Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0717045, was made in response to an application by Kidde Australia for reduced duty on certain firefighting hoses, and it came into force on the date the application was lodged, 9 October 2007. The application process requires public consultation, though in this instance, no submissions were received. The TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any new liabilities, though it does entitle eligible importers to claim refunds on duties paid prior to the TCO's effective date.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation are section 269C, 269B, 269E, 269P(3), and 269S(1) of the Customs Act 1901. These sections establish the framework for making Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) and set the criteria for such orders, including the requirement that no substitutable goods be produced in Australia at the time of the application (section 269C). If the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must make a written TCO (section 269P(3)). The TCO in question, No. 0717045, was made on 21 December 2007, declaring that certain firefighting hoses are subject to a zero per cent customs duty rate, down from the general rate of 5 per cent (section 269S(1)).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The applicant, such as Kidde Australia in this case, must submit a valid application to the CEO of Customs. The CEO, in turn, has the duty to assess whether the application meets the core criteria and to make a written order if the criteria are satisfied (section 269C and 269P(3)). Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties and consider these submissions before making a final decision (subsection 269K(1)). In this instance, no submissions were received in response to the published notice.
Any breach of the provisions under this Act can result in civil or criminal consequences. However, the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or maximum penalties for breaches of TCOs. Typically, breaches of customs regulations can result in fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any relevant provisions within the broader Customs Act 1901 and associated regulations. Importers can benefit from applying for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO was taken to have come into force, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, without incurring any liabilities for actions taken before the TCO registration date.