EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0714750
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Tytec Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain tyre retreading machinery on 10 September 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0714750 was made on 23 November 2007. It declares that those certain tyre retreading machinery are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0714750 is taken to have come into force on 10 September 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that reduce the duty on certain goods. This mechanism was introduced to address the issue of ensuring fair trade practices by allowing for tariff concessions where no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. In line with its policy objectives to promote efficient trade and support industry, the Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make these orders if certain criteria are met. Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0714750, made under this Act, provides a zero-rate duty on specific tyre retreading machinery, effective from the date the application was lodged, after the CEO was satisfied that the machinery in question is not produced in Australia and no submissions were received against the concession. This instrument is designed to benefit importers by allowing them to apply for refunds of duty paid on these goods since the effective date of the concession.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0714750 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to entities or individuals who import specific goods that are subject to a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). This legislation allows for a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods, as determined by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, provided that the application meets the core criteria outlined in the Act. These criteria require that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time the application is lodged. The scope of the Act extends to any goods that are eligible for tariff concessions, excluding those specified in section 269SJ of the Customs Act 1901, which cannot be subject to a TCO. The instrument has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia as it pertains to the importation of goods subject to the Customs Act 1901. The commencement date of the TCO is taken to be the date on which the application was lodged, with the specific TCO No. 0714750 commencing on 10 September 2007. The Act ensures that the implementation of the TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth or impose new liabilities on individuals or entities for actions taken prior to the TCO's registration.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0714750, which was made under section 269F of the Customs Act 1901, applies to certain tyre retreading machinery. Pursuant to section 269P(3) of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) issued this Instrument after being satisfied that the application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) met the core criteria as outlined in section 269C. Specifically, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged, as defined by sections 269D and 269E of the Act. This Instrument declares that the goods in question are subject to a TCO, which applies item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, resulting in a duty rate of free instead of the general rate of 5%.
Under this Act, the CEO is obligated to consider applications for a TCO and determine whether they meet the core criteria. If an application is deemed valid and meets the criteria, the CEO must issue a written TCO. Tytec Pty Ltd's application for the tyre retreading machinery was accepted and processed in accordance with these provisions, leading to the issuance of TCO No. 0714750. The CEO is also required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties who believe the TCO should not be granted. In this case, no submissions were received, allowing the TCO to proceed.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties governed by it include the requirement for applicants to provide sufficient information to satisfy the CEO that the goods in question are eligible for a TCO. The CEO must then evaluate the application against the core criteria and make a decision. The CEO must also publish notices in the Gazette to ensure transparency and allow for any objections. For importers of the goods affected by the TCO, there is an opportunity to apply for a refund of duty paid on imports before the TCO came into effect, as stipulated under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
The Act provides for potential consequences for those who fail to comply with its provisions. While the explanatory statement does not specify any particular offences, breaches of the Customs Act 1901 may result in civil or criminal penalties. Under section 234 of the Act, an offence against the Act can lead to a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, for individuals, and up to 50,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to ten years, or both, for bodies corporate. These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the Act’s requirements and the seriousness with which breaches are treated.